Literature DB >> 12771581

Moral justifications for surrogate decision making in the intensive care unit: implications and limitations.

Robert M Arnold1, John Kellum.   

Abstract

Because patients are often unable to participate in the end-of-life decision making, caregivers turn to close family members to participate in discussions regarding care in the intensive care unit. This article describes the moral justifications for families being given considerable decision-making authority. However, embedded within these justifications are also some limitations to surrogate decision making. Rather than attempt to dogmatically resolve these thorny cases regarding a surrogate's request for what healthcare providers believe are unreasonable requests, we believe more attention should be paid to how healthcare providers and intensive care units can promote a surrogate's ability to make ethical decisions. We end by offering a number of specific suggestions for improving communication with surrogates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12771581     DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000065123.23736.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  24 in total

1.  Undetected cognitive impairment and decision-making capacity in patients receiving hospice care.

Authors:  Cynthia Z Burton; Elizabeth W Twamley; Lana C Lee; Barton W Palmer; Dilip V Jeste; Laura B Dunn; Scott A Irwin
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.105

2.  Family understanding of seriously-ill patient preferences for family involvement in healthcare decision making.

Authors:  Rashmi K Sharma; Mark T Hughes; Marie T Nolan; Carrie Tudor; Joan Kub; Peter B Terry; Daniel P Sulmasy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Substituted judgment: the limitations of autonomy in surrogate decision making.

Authors:  Alexia M Torke; G Caleb Alexander; John Lantos
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  The complex roles of relatives in end-of-life decision-making: an ethical analysis.

Authors:  Stella Reiter-Theil; Marcel Mertz; Barbara Meyer-Zehnder
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2007-12

5.  Understanding Goals of Care Statements and Preferences among Patients and Their Surrogates in the Medical ICU.

Authors:  Debra S Brandt; Laura A Shinkunas; Thomas G Gehlbach; Lauris C Kaldjian
Journal:  J Hosp Palliat Nurs       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.918

6.  Family members' informal roles in end-of-life decision making in adult intensive care units.

Authors:  Jill R Quinn; Madeline Schmitt; Judith Gedney Baggs; Sally A Norton; Mary T Dombeck; Craig R Sellers
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  When patients lack capacity: the roles that patients with terminal diagnoses would choose for their physicians and loved ones in making medical decisions.

Authors:  Marie T Nolan; Mark Hughes; Derek Paul Narendra; Johanna R Sood; Peter B Terry; Alan B Astrow; Joan Kub; Richard E Thompson; Daniel P Sulmasy
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  Biologically-related or emotionally-connected: who would be the better surrogate decision-maker?

Authors:  Ashleigh Watson; Brigid Sheridan; Michelle Rodriguez; Ali Seifi
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-02

9.  Depressive symptoms among surrogate decision makers in Lebanese ICUs.

Authors:  Fadi Abou-Mrad; Charbel Mourad; Catherine Najem
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun

Review 10.  The collaborative autonomy model of medical decision-making.

Authors:  Michael A Rubin
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.210

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.