Literature DB >> 1735970

Acoustic interpretation of the voice range profile (phonetogram).

I R Titze1.   

Abstract

The voice range profile (VRP) is a display of vocal intensity range versus fundamental frequency (F0). Past measurements have shown that the intensity range is reduced at the extremes of the F0 range, that there is a gradual upward tilt of the high- and low-intensity boundaries with increasing F0, and that a ripple exists at the boundaries. The intensity ripple, which results from tuning of source harmonics to the formants, is more noticeable at the upper boundary than the lower boundary because higher harmonics are not energized as effectively near phonation threshold as at maximum lung pressure. The gradual tilt of the intensity boundaries results from more effective transmission and radiation of acoustic energy at higher fundamental frequencies. This depends on the spectral distribution of the source power, however, At low F0, a smaller spectral slope (more harmonic energy) produces greater intensity. At high F0, on the other hand, a shift of energy toward the fundamental results in greater intensity. This dependence of intensity on spectral distribution of source power seems to explain the reduced intensity range at higher F0. An unrelated problem of reduced intensity range at low F0 stems from the inherent difficulty of keeping F0 from rising when subglottal pressure is increased.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1735970     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3501.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  9 in total

1.  Correlation of orofacial speeds with voice acoustic measures in the fluent speech of persons who stutter.

Authors:  Michael D McClean; Stephen M Tasko
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Measures of spectral slope using an excised larynx model.

Authors:  Fariborz Alipour; Ronald C Scherer; Eileen Finnegan
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  The impact of perilaryngeal vibration on the self-perception of loudness and the Lombard effect.

Authors:  François-Xavier Brajot; Don Nguyen; Jeffrey DiGiovanni; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Peripheral mechanisms for vocal production in birds - differences and similarities to human speech and singing.

Authors:  Tobias Riede; Franz Goller
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Chiropractic care for a patient with spasmodic dysphonia associated with cervical spine trauma.

Authors:  Roger K Waddell
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2005

6.  Bird song and anthropogenic noise: vocal constraints may explain why birds sing higher-frequency songs in cities.

Authors:  Erwin Nemeth; Nadia Pieretti; Sue Anne Zollinger; Nicole Geberzahn; Jesko Partecke; Ana Catarina Miranda; Henrik Brumm
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Conservative approaches to the management of voice disorders.

Authors:  Eberhard Kruse
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-09-28

8.  An ultrathin conformable vibration-responsive electronic skin for quantitative vocal recognition.

Authors:  Siyoung Lee; Junsoo Kim; Inyeol Yun; Geun Yeol Bae; Daegun Kim; Sangsik Park; Il-Min Yi; Wonkyu Moon; Yoonyoung Chung; Kilwon Cho
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Systematic evaluation of laryngeal impairment in Sjögren's syndrome.

Authors:  S Graf; L Kirschstein; A Knopf; N Mansour; O Jeleff-Wölfler; A M S Buchberger; B Hofauer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.503

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.