Literature DB >> 15248043

Correlation of orofacial speeds with voice acoustic measures in the fluent speech of persons who stutter.

Michael D McClean1, Stephen M Tasko.   

Abstract

Stuttering is often viewed as a problem in coordinating the movements of different muscle systems involved in speech production. From this perspective, it is logical that efforts be made to quantify and compare the strength of neural coupling between muscle systems in persons who stutter (PS) and those who do not stutter (NS). This problem was addressed by correlating the speeds of different orofacial structures with vowel fundamental frequency (F0) and intensity as subjects produced fluent repetitions of a simple nonsense phrase at habitual, high, and low intensity levels. It is assumed that resulting correlations indirectly reflect the strength of neural coupling between particular orofacial structures and the respiratory-laryngeal system. An electromagnetic system was employed to record movements of the upper lip, lower lip, tongue, and jaw in 43 NS and 39 PS. The acoustic speech signal was recorded and used to obtain measures of vowel F0 and intensity. For each subject, correlation measures were obtained relating peak orofacial speeds to F0 and intensity. Correlations were significantly reduced in PS compared to NS for the lower lip and tongue, although the magnitude of these group differences covaried with the correlation levels relating F0 and intensity. It is suggested that the group difference in correlation pattern reflects a reduced strength of neural coupling of the lower lip and tongue systems to the respiratory-laryngeal system in PS. Consideration is given to how this may contribute to temporal discoordination and stuttering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15248043     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1952-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  23 in total

1.  Kinematic correlates of speaking rate changes in stuttering and normally fluent adults.

Authors:  A Smith; J Kleinow
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  The interrelationship of subglottic air pressure, fundamental frequency, and vocal intensity during speech.

Authors:  R L Plant; R M Younger
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 3.  Motor mechanisms in speech ontogeny: phylogenetic, neurobiological and linguistic implications.

Authors:  P F MacNeilage; B L Davis
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  The relation of lung volume initiation to selected acoustic properties of speech.

Authors:  Peter J Watson; Angela H Ciccia; Gary Weismer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Association of orofacial with laryngeal and respiratory motor output during speech.

Authors:  Michael D McClean; Stephen M Tasko
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Time relations between cricothyroid muscle activity and the voice fundamental frequency (F0) during sinusoidal modulations of F0.

Authors:  S Sapir; M D McClean; E S Luschei
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Correlation analysis of the physiological factors controlling fundamental voice frequency.

Authors:  J E Atkinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Articulatory dynamics of fluent utterances of stutterers and nonstutterers.

Authors:  G Zimmermann
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1980-03

9.  Gain and spatial characteristics of human lip-muscle reflexes.

Authors:  M D McClean
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1989-11-27       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Intentional changes in sound pressure level and rate: their impact on measures of respiration, phonation, and articulation.

Authors:  C Dromey; L O Ramig
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  2 in total

1.  Speech Movement Variability in People Who Stutter: A Vocal Tract Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Charlotte E E Wiltshire; Mark Chiew; Jennifer Chesters; Máiréad P Healy; Kate E Watkins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Effect of Different Body Postures on the Severity of Stuttering in Young Adults with Developmental Stuttering.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Almudhi; Hamayun Zafar; Shahnawaz Anwer; Ahmad Alghadir
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.