Literature DB >> 17354918

Recovery of surgical workflow without explicit models.

Seyed-Ahmad Ahmadi1, Tobias Sielhorst, Ralf Stauder, Martin Horn, Hubertus Feussner, Nassir Navab.   

Abstract

Workflow recovery is crucial for designing context-sensitive service systems in future operating rooms. Abstract knowledge about actions which are being performed is particularly valuable in the OR. This knowledge can be used for many applications such as optimizing the workflow, recovering average workflows for guiding and evaluating training surgeons, automatic report generation and ultimately for monitoring in a context aware operating room. This paper describes a novel way for automatic recovery of the surgical workflow. Our algorithms perform this task without an implicit or explicit model of the surgery. This is achieved by the synchronization of multidimensional state vectors of signals recorded in different operations of the same type. We use an enhanced version of the dynamic time warp algorithm to calculate the temporal registration. The algorithms have been tested on 17 signals of six different surgeries of the same type. The results on this dataset are very promising because the algorithms register the steps in the surgery correctly up to seconds, which is our sampling rate. Our software visualizes the temporal registration by displaying the videos of different surgeries of the same type with varying duration precisely synchronized to each other. The synchronized videos of one surgery are either slowed down or speeded up in order to show the same steps as the ones presented in the videos of the other surgery.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17354918     DOI: 10.1007/11866565_52

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv


  17 in total

Review 1.  Review of methods for objective surgical skill evaluation.

Authors:  Carol E Reiley; Henry C Lin; David D Yuh; Gregory D Hager
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Surgical robotics beyond enhanced dexterity instrumentation: a survey of machine learning techniques and their role in intelligent and autonomous surgical actions.

Authors:  Yohannes Kassahun; Bingbin Yu; Abraham Temesgen Tibebu; Danail Stoyanov; Stamatia Giannarou; Jan Hendrik Metzen; Emmanuel Vander Poorten
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 3.  Surgical process modelling: a review.

Authors:  Florent Lalys; Pierre Jannin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  LapOntoSPM: an ontology for laparoscopic surgeries and its application to surgical phase recognition.

Authors:  Darko Katić; Chantal Julliard; Anna-Laura Wekerle; Hannes Kenngott; Beat Peter Müller-Stich; Rüdiger Dillmann; Stefanie Speidel; Pierre Jannin; Bernard Gibaud
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Analysis of surgical intervention populations using generic surgical process models.

Authors:  Thomas Neumuth; Pierre Jannin; Juliane Schlomberg; Jürgen Meixensberger; Peter Wiedemann; Oliver Burgert
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-06-06       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Bridging the gap between formal and experience-based knowledge for context-aware laparoscopy.

Authors:  Darko Katić; Jürgen Schuck; Anna-Laura Wekerle; Hannes Kenngott; Beat Peter Müller-Stich; Rüdiger Dillmann; Stefanie Speidel
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  System events: readily accessible features for surgical phase detection.

Authors:  Anand Malpani; Colin Lea; Chi Chiung Grace Chen; Gregory D Hager
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Online time and resource management based on surgical workflow time series analysis.

Authors:  M Maktabi; T Neumuth
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  SAGES consensus recommendations on an annotation framework for surgical video.

Authors:  Ozanan R Meireles; Guy Rosman; Maria S Altieri; Lawrence Carin; Gregory Hager; Amin Madani; Nicolas Padoy; Carla M Pugh; Patricia Sylla; Thomas M Ward; Daniel A Hashimoto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Sensor-based machine learning for workflow detection and as key to detect expert level in laparoscopic suturing and knot-tying.

Authors:  Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Carly R Garrow; Mona W Schmidt; Laura Benner; Beat P Müller-Stich; Felix Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.