Literature DB >> 17353868

[Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus laparoscopic total hysterectomy: a prospective randomized study].

M Morelli1, R Noia, D Chiodo, R Mocciaro, A Costantino, M T Caruso, C Cosco, E Lucia, B Curcio, G Gullì, G Amendola, F Zullo.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare surgical complications and clinical outcomes after supracervical versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for the control of abnormal uterine bleeding or symptomatic uterine leiomyomata.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized trial on 141 patients who had laparoscopic hysterectomy for symptomatic uterine leiomyomata, abnormal bleeding refractory to hormonal treatment, or both. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a supracervical or total laparoscopic hysterectomy. We compared surgical complications and clinical outcomes for 2 years after randomization.
RESULTS: Seventy-one participants were assigned to supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy (SLH) and 70 to total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Hysterectomy by either techniques led to statistically significant reductions in most symptoms, including pelvic pain or pressure, back pain and urinary incontinence. Patients assigned to SLH tended to have more hospital readmissions than those randomized to TLH. There were no statistically significant differences in the rate of complications, degree of symptoms improvement, or activity limitation. Participants weighing more than 100 kg at study entry were more than twice as likely to be readmitted to the hospital during the 2-year of follow-up (OR 2.48, 95% CI 0.11; 1.91, P=0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe statistically significant differences between SLH and TLH in surgical complications and clinical outcomes during the 2-years of follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17353868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Ginecol        ISSN: 0026-4784


  6 in total

1.  Hysterectomy-a comparison of approaches.

Authors:  Andreas Müller; Falk C Thiel; Stefan P Renner; Mathias Winkler; Lothar Häberle; Matthias W Beckmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: 10 steps toward a successful procedure.

Authors:  Jon I Einarsson; Yoko Suzuki
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

3.  Pelvic floor symptoms 5 to 14 years after total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gabriel Francisco Aleixo; Marcelo C M Fonseca; Maria Augusta Tezelli Bortolini; Luiz Gustavo O Brito; Rodrigo A Castro
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Long-Term Outcomes of the Total or Supracervical Hysterectomy (TOSH) Trial.

Authors:  W Jerod Greer; Holly E Richter; Thomas L Wheeler; R Edward Varner; Jeff M Szychowski; Miriam Kuppermann; Lee A Learman
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.091

5.  Urinary incontinence following subtotal and total hysterectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Priscila Scalabrin Longo; Laura Virilo Borbily; Felipe Placco Araujo Glina
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-05-02

6.  Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy compared to total hysterectomy.

Authors:  Lucio Cipullo; Sania De Paoli; Luigi Fasolino; Antonio Fasolino
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.