Literature DB >> 20539807

Hysterectomy-a comparison of approaches.

Andreas Müller1, Falk C Thiel, Stefan P Renner, Mathias Winkler, Lothar Häberle, Matthias W Beckmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The advantages and disadvantages of the various surgical techniques for hysterectomy are currently a topic of debate, with particular controversy over leaving the cervix in situ in the laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LASH) procedure.
METHODS: In a retrospective single-center study, medical history and clinical characteristics were compared in patients who had undergone hysterectomy for benign disease in the period 2002-2008 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital. Postoperative satisfaction and the frequency of secondary operations for prolapse or incontinence in women with surgery between 2002 and 2007 were surveyed by means of a questionnaire.
RESULTS: The longest hospital stay was observed after abdominal hysterectomy (AH; 10 days), followed by vaginal hysterectomy (VH; 7.8 days) and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH; 7.2 days). The shortest stays in hospital were seen after LASH (5.9 days) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH; 5.7 days). The shortest operating time was noted with VH (87 min) and the longest with LAVH (122 min). The lowest rates of blood loss were with LASH (1.38 g/dL) and TLH (1.51 g/dL). The highest rate of postoperative complications occurred after AH (8.9%). No differences were found in relation to postoperative satisfaction or surgery for prolapse or incontinence.
CONCLUSION: No postoperative benefits were found for leaving the cervix in situ when performing LASH. However, this was not a controlled randomized study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20539807      PMCID: PMC2883234          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  26 in total

1.  A randomized study of total abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  S C Ribeiro; R M Ribeiro; N C Santos; J A Pinotti
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Respective consequences of abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomies on women's sexuality.

Authors:  J M Ayoubi; R Fanchin; X Monrozies; P Imbert; J M Reme; J C Pons
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  Results of eVALuate study of hysterectomy techniques: laparoscopic hysterectomy may yet have a bright future.

Authors:  M J Canis; A Wattiez; G Mage; M A Bruhat
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-13

4.  Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal versus abdominal surgery in patients with endometrial cancer--a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  S Malur; M Possover; W Michels; A Schneider
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  N Johnson; D Barlow; A Lethaby; E Tavender; E Curr; R Garry
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-04-19

6.  The Hohl instrument for optimizing total laparoscopic hysterectomy procedures.

Authors:  Andreas Mueller; Peter Oppelt; Sven Ackermann; Helge Binder; Matthias W Beckmann
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.137

7.  Sexuality after total vs. subtotal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Vibeke Zobbe; Helga Gimbel; Birthe Margrethe Andersen; Thomas Filtenborg; Kristian Jakobsen; Helle Christina Sørensen; Kim Toftager-Larsen; Katrine Sidenius; Nini Møller; Ellen Merete Madsen; Mogens Vejtorp; Helle Clausen; Annie Rosgaard; Christian Gluud; Bent S Ottesen; Ann Tabor
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Ray Garry; Jayne Fountain; Su Mason; Jeremy Hawe; Vicky Napp; Jason Abbott; Richard Clayton; Graham Phillips; Mark Whittaker; Richard Lilford; Stephen Bridgman; Julia Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-07

9.  Selective incorporation of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for adnexal pathology and body mass index.

Authors:  Katherine A O'Hanlan; Gloria Shining Huang; Lisbeth Lopez; Anne-Caroline Garnier
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  L Benassi; T Rossi; C T Kaihura; L Ricci; L Bedocchi; B Galanti; E Vadora
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  11 in total

1.  Six authors.

Authors:  Jürgen Nieder
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Patient welfare.

Authors:  Ulrich Steigerwald
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  The marketing effect.

Authors:  Johannes Dietl
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Should Fallopian Tubes Be Removed During Hysterectomy Procedures? - A Statement by AGO Ovar.

Authors:  M Pölcher; S Hauptmann; C Fotopoulou; B Schmalfeldt; I Meinhold-Heerlein; A Mustea; I Runnebaum; J Sehouli
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.915

5.  A prospective, randomized clinical comparison between UltraCision and the novel sealing and cutting device BiCision in patients with laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Ralf Rothmund; Mara Szyrach; Ali Reda; Markus D Enderle; Alexander Neugebauer; Florin-Andrei Taran; Sara Brucker; Andrea Hausch; Christian Wallwiener; Bernhard Kraemer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comment on the New DGGG AWMF S3-Guideline on Hysterectomy, or a Plea for LAVH as the Gold Standard for Total Hysterectomy Procedures.

Authors:  R L De Wilde
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 7.  The diagnosis and treatment of endometrial cancer: progress and controversies.

Authors:  Dominik Denschlag; Uwe Ulrich; Günter Emons
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-08-29       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  Detection rate with routine postoperative renal ultrasound to identify urinary tract injury after gynecological surgery.

Authors:  Simon Binder; Alexander Boosz; Ioannis Kolioulis; Evgeni Baev; Nadine Müller; Janine Krämer; Andreas Müller
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 2.493

9.  Occult Malignancy Rate of 1498 Hysterectomies or Myomectomies with Morcellation: A Retrospective Single-Arm Study.

Authors:  Garri Tchartchian; Bernd Bojahr; Sven Becker; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo; Vasilis Tanos; Hugo C Verhoeven; Markus Wallwiener; Rudy L De Wilde
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2018-12-04

10.  Predictors of the cost of hysterectomy for benign indications.

Authors:  Abdelrahman AlAshqar; Metin E Goktepe; Gokhan S Kilic; Mostafa A Borahay
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-10-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.