Literature DB >> 30467762

Pelvic floor symptoms 5 to 14 years after total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gabriel Francisco Aleixo1, Marcelo C M Fonseca2, Maria Augusta Tezelli Bortolini3, Luiz Gustavo O Brito4, Rodrigo A Castro2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We aim to compare total versus subtotal abdominal hysterectomy regarding urinary and bowel symptoms and pelvic organ prolapse at long-term follow-up.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed on the MEDLINE, LILACS, Cochrane CENTRAL and SCOPUS databases and conference abstracts (AAGL, AUGS, ICS) from inception up to November 2017. We included randomized trials comparing total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign conditions that evaluated pelvic floor symptoms over 5 years of follow-up. Risk of bias and GRADE assessment for quality of evidence were performed.
RESULTS: We included four studies involving 566 participants with follow-up ranging from 5 to 14 years. Women who underwent total hysterectomy presented lower risk of reported urinary incontinence [RR 0.74 (CI = 0.58, 0.94) i2 0%; p = 0.02] and stress urinary incontinence [RR 0.84 (CI = 0.71, 0.99) i2 0%; p = 0.04] than those who had subtotal hysterectomy. The events urinary frequency, urge incontinence, incomplete bladder emptying, pelvic organ prolapse, incontinence of stool and constipation did not favor one procedure over another in the long term (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported urinary incontinence and stress urinary incontinence events favored total hysterectomy over subtotal hysterectomy up to 14-year long-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hysterectomy; Long-term; Meta-analysis; Review; Subtotal; Supracervical; Total

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30467762     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-018-3811-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  33 in total

Review 1.  Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression.

Authors:  Hans C van Houwelingen; Lidia R Arends; Theo Stijnen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Randomized clinical trial of total vs. subtotal hysterectomy: validity of the trial questionnaire.

Authors:  Helga Gimbel; Vibeke Zobbe; Bent S Ottesen; Ann Tabor
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 3.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson; Jonathan J Deeks; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-06

4.  [Total versus subtotal hysterectomy. A follow-up study].

Authors:  L LAURIDSEN; V C JENSEN
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  1961-03-03

Review 5.  Pathophysiology of urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Paul Hilton; Lucia M Dolan
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Effect of vaginal devices on bladder neck mobility in stress incontinent women.

Authors:  L Mouritsen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 7.  Total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions.

Authors:  A Lethaby; V Ivanova; N P Johnson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-04-19

8.  Long term outcome following laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.

Authors:  E O Okaro; K D Jones; C Sutton
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  A randomized comparison of total or supracervical hysterectomy: surgical complications and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Lee A Learman; Robert L Summitt; R Edward Varner; S Gene McNeeley; Deborah Goodman-Gruen; Holly E Richter; Feng Lin; Jonathan Showstack; Christine C Ireland; Eric Vittinghoff; Stephen B Hulley; A Eugene Washington
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Psychological reactions and sexual life after hysterectomy with and without oophorectomy.

Authors:  J Nathorst-Böös; B von Schoultz
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.031

View more
  1 in total

1.  Current Resources for Evidence-Based Practice, May 2020.

Authors:  Marit L Bovbjerg
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2020-04-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.