Literature DB >> 17353309

Detection of intracranial atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease with 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with sensitivity encoding at 3T.

C G Choi1, D H Lee, J H Lee, H W Pyun, D W Kang, S U Kwon, J K Kim, S J Kim, D C Suh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The spatial resolution of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF-MRA) can be improved within a reasonable examination time by combining 3T and sensitivity encoding technique. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of high-resolution 3D TOF-MRA at 3T in patients with suspected atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease of the intracranial arteries.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed 160 arteries in 39 patients: 68 distal internal carotid arteries, 68 middle cerebral arteries, and 24 vertebrobasilar arteries. The measured voxel size of 3D TOF-MRA was 0.28 x 0.56 x 1.2 mm(3). Steno-occlusive disease was assessed independently by 2 observers using conventional angiography as the reference standard.
RESULTS: According to observers 1 and 2, respectively, 3D TOF-MRA at 3T had a sensitivity of 78%/85% (21/27, 23/27), a specificity of 95%/95% (126/133, 127/133), a positive predictive value of 75%/79% (21/28, 23/29), and a negative predictive value of 95%/97% (126/132, 127/131), using a 50%-99% threshold of diameter stenosis. For detection of complete occlusion, according to observers 1 and 2, respectively, 3D TOF-MRA at 3T had a sensitivity of 100% (13/13), a specificity of 99% (145/147), a positive predictive value of 87% (13/15), and a negative predictive value of 100% (145/145). Interobserver agreement of 3D TOF-MRA was excellent (kappa = 0.81).
CONCLUSION: High-resolution 3D TOF-MRA with sensitivity encoding at 3T can be used as a reliable diagnostic tool for the detection of clinically significant steno-occlusive disease of major intracranial arteries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17353309      PMCID: PMC7977826     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  25 in total

1.  SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI.

Authors:  K P Pruessmann; M Weiger; M B Scheidegger; P Boesiger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Vessel contrast at three Tesla in time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial and carotid arteries.

Authors:  Osama Al-Kwifi; Derek J Emery; Alan H Wilman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Time-of-flight MR angiography: comparison of 3.0-T imaging and 1.5-T imaging--initial experience.

Authors:  Winfried A Willinek; Markus Born; Birgit Simon; Henriette J Tschampa; Carsten Krautmacher; Jurgen Gieseke; Horst Urbach; Hans J Textor; Hans H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Artifacts in maximum-intensity-projection display of MR angiograms.

Authors:  C M Anderson; D Saloner; J S Tsuruda; L G Shapeero; R E Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Identification, prognosis, and management of patients with carotid artery near occlusion.

Authors:  Allan J Fox; Michael Eliasziw; Peter M Rothwell; Matthias H Schmidt; Charles P Warlow; Henry J M Barnett
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Reliability and validity of noninvasive imaging of internal carotid artery pseudo-occlusion.

Authors:  G Fürst; A Saleh; F Wenserski; J Malms; M Cohnen; A Aulich; T Neumann-Haefelin; M Schroeter; H Steinmetz; M Sitzer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Cilostazol prevents the progression of the symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis: the multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled trial of cilostazol in symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.

Authors:  Sun U Kwon; Yong-Jin Cho; Ja-Seong Koo; Hee-Joon Bae; Yong-Seok Lee; Keun-Sik Hong; Jun Hong Lee; Jong S Kim
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Improved image quality of intracranial aneurysms: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T time-of-flight MR angiography.

Authors:  Gordon F Gibbs; John Huston; Matt A Bernstein; Stephen J Riederer; Robert D Brown
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Intracranial arteries: prospective blinded comparative study of MR angiography and DSA in 50 patients.

Authors:  K W Stock; E W Radue; A L Jacob; X S Bao; W Steinbrich
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction. The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study.

Authors:  R L Sacco; D E Kargman; Q Gu; M C Zamanillo
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Current diagnosis and management of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  Shyam Prabhakaran; Jose G Romano
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.710

2.  Quality-evaluation scheme for cerebral time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography techniques.

Authors:  H Raoult; J-C Ferré; X Morandi; B Carsin-Nicol; M Carsin; M Cuggia; M Law; J-Y Gauvrit
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Main anatomical features of the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery: a 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography at 3 T study.

Authors:  Fabrice Vuillier; Elisabeth Medeiros; Thierry Moulin; Francoise Cattin; Jean-Francois Bonneville; Laurent Tatu
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Prevalence of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis Using High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Angiography in the General Population: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

Authors:  Muhammad Fareed K Suri; Ye Qiao; Xiaoye Ma; Eliseo Guallar; Jincheng Zhou; Yiyi Zhang; Li Liu; Haitao Chu; Adnan I Qureshi; Alvaro Alonso; Aaron R Folsom; Bruce A Wasserman
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 5.  Noncontrast MR angiography: An update.

Authors:  Robert R Edelman; Ioannis Koktzoglou
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Analysis of enlarged images using time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography, computed tomography, and conventional angiography.

Authors:  Yeong-Cheol Heo; Hae-Kag Lee; Han-Jun Yang; Jae-Hwan Cho
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Detection of vessel wall calcifications in vertebral arteries using susceptibility weighted imaging.

Authors:  Lisa C Adams; Sarah M Böker; Yvonne Y Bender; Eva M Fallenberg; Moritz Wagner; Thomas Liebig; Bernd Hamm; Marcus R Makowski
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Comparison of 3D magnetic resonance imaging and digital subtraction angiography for intracranial artery stenosis.

Authors:  Ji Eun Park; Seung Chai Jung; Sang Hun Lee; Ji Young Jeon; Ji Ye Lee; Ho Sung Kim; Choong-Gon Choi; Sang Joon Kim; Deok Hee Lee; Seon-Ok Kim; Sun U Kwon; Dong-Wha Kang; Jong S Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Evaluation of the applicability of territorial arterial spin labeling in meningiomas for presurgical assessments compared with 3-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Yiping Lu; Shihai Luan; Li Liu; Ji Xiong; Jianbo Wen; Jianxun Qu; Daoying Geng; Bo Yin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Advances in imaging of intracranial atherosclerotic disease and implications for treatment.

Authors:  Fan Z Caprio; Shyam Prabhakaran
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.