Literature DB >> 12034339

Vessel contrast at three Tesla in time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial and carotid arteries.

Osama Al-Kwifi1, Derek J Emery, Alan H Wilman.   

Abstract

The effects of the increased field strength of 3T on blood vessel contrast in three-dimensional time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography (MRA) of the intracranial and carotid arteries was evaluated. Bloch equation simulations based on measured longitudinal relaxation times suggested superior blood-to-background contrast might be expected at 3T over 1.5T when using typical 3D TOF MRA parameters. A 15-volunteer study found that 3T was preferable over 1.5T for visualising distal intracranial vessels and the carotid arteries, by providing superior background suppression and excellent fat suppression. The combination of improved background suppression and improved signal-to-noise at 3T, enabled high resolution intracranial 3D TOF MRA with voxel volumes as small as 0.14 mm(3) to be acquired.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12034339     DOI: 10.1016/s0730-725x(02)00486-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  23 in total

1.  High-resolution 3D-constructive interference in steady-state MR imaging and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography in neurovascular compression: a comparison between 3T and 1.5T.

Authors:  M Garcia; R Naraghi; T Zumbrunn; J Rösch; P Hastreiter; A Dörfler
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  [Clinical MR at 3 Tesla: current status].

Authors:  K T Baudendistel; J T Heverhagen; M V Knopp
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  A systematic review of the utility of 1.5 versus 3 Tesla magnetic resonance brain imaging in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Joanna M Wardlaw; Will Brindle; Ana M Casado; Kirsten Shuler; Moira Henderson; Brenda Thomas; Jennifer Macfarlane; Susana Muñoz Maniega; Katherine Lymer; Zoe Morris; Cyril Pernet; William Nailon; Trevor Ahearn; Abdul Nashirudeen Mumuni; Carlos Mugruza; John McLean; Goultchira Chakirova; Yuehui Terry Tao; Johanna Simpson; Andrew C Stanfield; Harriet Johnston; Jehill Parikh; Natalie A Royle; Janet De Wilde; Mark E Bastin; Nick Weir; Andrew Farrall; Maria C Valdes Hernandez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  MR imaging of the brachial plexus: comparison between 1.5-T and 3-T MR imaging: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Alberto Tagliafico; Giulia Succio; Carlo Emanuele Neumaier; Giovanni Serafini; Matteo Ghidara; Massimo Calabrese; Carlo Martinoli
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  High spatial resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries using the quadrature body coil at 3.0T: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Winfried A Willinek; Thomas Bayer; Jürgen Gieseke; Marcus von Falkenhausen; Torsten Sommer; Romhild Hoogeveen; Kai Wilhelm; Horst Urbach; Hans H Schild
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  MR angiography of the intracranial vessels: technical aspects and clinical applications.

Authors:  Ozkan Ozsarlak; Johan W Van Goethem; Menno Maes; Paul M Parizel
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-12-04       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  3.0-T high-field magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis: preliminary experiences.

Authors:  N Morakkabati-Spitz; J Gieseke; C Kuhl; G Lutterbey; M von Falkenhausen; F Traeber; O Zivanovic; H H Schild
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-12-31       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Advantages and pitfalls in 3T MR brain imaging: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Bernd L Schmitz; Andrik J Aschoff; Martin H K Hoffmann; Georg Grön
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 9.  Modern cross-sectional imaging in the diagnosis and follow-up of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Karsten Papke; Friedhelm Brassel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  To TOF or not to TOF: strategies for non-contrast-enhanced intracranial MRA at 7 T.

Authors:  Stefan Maderwald; Susanne C Ladd; Elke R Gizewski; Oliver Kraff; Jens M Theysohn; Karsten Wicklow; Christoph Moenninghoff; Isabel Wanke; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.