Literature DB >> 17352005

What is the ideal support group? Views of Australian people with cancer and their carers.

Phyllis N Butow1, Laura T Kirsten, Jane M Ussher, Gerard V Wain, Mirjana Sandoval, Kim M Hobbs, Katharine Hodgkinson, Annie Stenlake.   

Abstract

AIMS: To explore views on the ideal structure and process of support groups for cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 184 cancer support groups identified in NSW, Australia, 50 were randomly selected within strata of five variations in group structure: homogenous versus heterogenous participants; urban versus rural; community versus hospital setting, leader with cancer experience or not; and with professional training or not. Four hundred and seventy-six group members completed a questionnaire.
RESULTS: Participants valued being with others like them, gaining information about cancer and having an effective leader. Groups were seen to be currently failing people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds, and links with oncology health professionals were inadequate. Few clear preferences for structure were expressed, except for the non-exclusion of those with a poor prognosis. Patients tended to prefer the structure of their own group, but patients longer since diagnosis, those with better informal support and carers preferred to meet in the community setting, while men with prostate cancer preferred a medical setting.
CONCLUSIONS: Some suggestions for group structure and process can be made on the basis of these findings; however, individual variation suggests that a needs analysis should be made by individual groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17352005     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  6 in total

1.  Characteristics of professionally-led and peer-led cancer support groups in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Clare Stevinson; Anne Lydon; Ziv Amir
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Cancer support group participation in the United Kingdom: a national survey.

Authors:  Clare Stevinson; Anne Lydon; Ziv Amir
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Dignity and deferral narratives as strategies in facilitated technology-based support groups for people with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Annette F Street; Kate Wakelin; Amanda Hordern; Nicola Bruce; Dell Horey
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2012-02-22

4.  Online, Group-Based Psychological Support for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors: Results from the Recapture Life Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Ursula M Sansom-Daly; Claire E Wakefield; Sarah J Ellis; Brittany C McGill; Mark W Donoghoe; Phyllis Butow; Richard A Bryant; Susan M Sawyer; Pandora Patterson; Antoinette Anazodo; Megan Plaster; Kate Thompson; Lucy Holland; Michael Osborn; Fiona Maguire; Catherine O'Dwyer; Richard De Abreu Lourenco; Richard J Cohn
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Online group-based cognitive-behavioural therapy for adolescents and young adults after cancer treatment: a multicenter randomised controlled trial of Recapture Life-AYA.

Authors:  Ursula M Sansom-Daly; Claire E Wakefield; Richard A Bryant; Phyllis Butow; Susan Sawyer; Pandora Patterson; Antoinette Anazodo; Kate Thompson; Richard J Cohn
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 6.  Do personal stories make patient decision aids more effective? A critical review of theory and evidence.

Authors:  Hilary L Bekker; Anna E Winterbottom; Phyllis Butow; Amanda J Dillard; Deb Feldman-Stewart; Floyd J Fowler; Maria L Jibaja-Weiss; Victoria A Shaffer; Robert J Volk
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.