Literature DB >> 20424867

Cancer support group participation in the United Kingdom: a national survey.

Clare Stevinson1, Anne Lydon, Ziv Amir.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Existing data on cancer support groups come largely from small studies in specific geographic areas, particularly in the UK. This study was designed on a national scale to describe the characteristics of support group members and examine associations between group and participant variables and perceived outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A postal survey of support groups in the UK was performed with group leaders asked to distribute questionnaires to their members. Questionnaires included sections for demographic and medical information, group attendance, perceived outcomes and psychosocial variables.
RESULTS: From an original pool of 2,883 members from 206 groups, a total of 748 patient members within 172 support groups participated. Females comprised 68.2% of the sample, mean age was 65.4 ± 10.2 years, and 73.3% were retired. Post-secondary education was reported by 42.2%, and the proportion living in the two least deprived quartiles was 35.6%. Participants were a mean of 76.5 ± 67.4 months post-diagnosis, with 60.6% in remission. Breast cancer was the most common diagnosis (48.8%). The mean length of membership was 56.0 ± 54.7 months. Frequency of perceived benefits was positively associated with length of membership and attendance record. Psychosocial outcomes did not differ based on group variables.
CONCLUSION: Support group participants are more often female, white, retired, married and long-term cancer survivors. Contrary to earlier studies, support group members do not tend to have high educational achievements or socioeconomic status. Perceived benefits are highest among long-term members and regular attenders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20424867     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-010-0887-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  28 in total

Review 1.  Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.

Authors:  Phil Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike Clarke; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Sarah Pratap; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-18

2.  An example of maximizing survey return rates. Methodological issues for health professionals.

Authors:  Cheryl Gore-Felton; Cheryl Koopman; Edwin Bridges; Carl Thoresen; David Spiegel
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Experience, functions and benefits of a cancer support group.

Authors:  Andrea Docherty
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2004-10

Review 4.  Cancer peer support programs-do they work?

Authors:  H Sharon Campbell; Marie Rose Phaneuf; Karen Deane
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2004-10

5.  Development and evaluation of an instrument to assess social difficulties in routine oncology practice.

Authors:  E P Wright; M Kiely; C Johnston; A B Smith; A Cull; P J Selby
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  A qualitative analysis of reasons for leaving, or not attending, a cancer support group.

Authors:  Jane M Ussher; Laura Kirsten; Phyllis Butow; Mirjana Sandoval
Journal:  Soc Work Health Care       Date:  2008

7.  Gender, cancer experience and internet use: a comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups.

Authors:  Clive Seale; Sue Ziebland; Jonathan Charteris-Black
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients before and after participation in a cancer support group.

Authors:  A Montazeri; S Jarvandi; S Haghighat; M Vahdani; A Sajadian; M Ebrahimi; M Haji-Mahmoodi
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2001-12-01

9.  Interest and participation in support group programs among patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Luke L Bui; Linda Last; Holly Bradley; Calvin H L Law; Barbara-Anne Maier; Andrew J Smith
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.592

10.  Emotional support for cancer patients: what do patients really want?

Authors:  M L Slevin; S E Nichols; S M Downer; P Wilson; T A Lister; S Arnott; J Maher; R L Souhami; J S Tobias; A H Goldstone; M Cody
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  Japanese Cancer Survivors' Awareness of and Participation in Support Groups.

Authors:  Yutaka Hatano; Sachiko Mitsuki; Toyoshi Hosokawa; Kenji Fukui
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Randomized controlled trial of patient navigation for newly diagnosed cancer patients: effects on quality of life.

Authors:  Samantha Hendren; Jennifer J Griggs; Ronald Epstein; Sharon Humiston; Pascal Jean-Pierre; Paul Winters; Mechelle Sanders; Starlene Loader; Kevin Fiscella
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Score equivalence of electronic and paper versions of the Social Difficulties Inventory (SDI-21): a randomised crossover trial in cancer patients.

Authors:  Laura Ashley; Ada Keding; Julia Brown; Galina Velikova; Penny Wright
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Examining management and research priorities in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica: a primary care questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Chris Morton; Sara Muller; Milica Bucknall; Kate Gilbert; Christian D Mallen; Samantha L Hider
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 2.980

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.