Literature DB >> 17349734

Reconstructive surgery for invasive squamous carcinoma of the glans penis.

Yuko Smith1, Paul Hadway, Olaf Biedrzycki, Matthew J A Perry, Catherine Corbishley, Nicholas A Watkin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We present medium-term outcome data for patients with invasive penile cancer treated with glansectomy and reconstruction with a split-thickness skin graft.
METHODS: A series of consecutive patients referred with penile malignancies over a 6-yr period were analyzed prospectively. A dedicated histopathologist reviewed all the specimens. After clinical staging, patients with tumours confined to the glans were offered glansectomy.
RESULTS: A total of 72 patients (32% of patients, 31% of procedures) underwent glansectomy for penile carcinoma. Of these, 65 patients were new diagnoses and seven were recurrences after radiotherapy. The mean follow-up period was 27 mo (range: 4-68 mo). There have been three late local recurrences (4%).
CONCLUSION: Glansectomy appears to be an oncologically safe and effective procedure for patients with glans-confined squamous cell tumours. It preserves maximum phallic length and results in a very satisfactory cosmetic penile appearance after reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17349734     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.02.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  18 in total

Review 1.  [Organ-sparing surgery for penile cancer].

Authors:  B Schlenker; C Gratzke; D Tilki; E Hungerhuber; P Schneede; O Reich; C G Stief; M Seitz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Surgical treatment of primary disease for penile squamous cell carcinoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database analysis.

Authors:  Yao Zhu; Wei-Jie Gu; Hong-Kai Wang; Cheng-Yuan Gu; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 3.  Penile preserving and reconstructive surgery in the management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Challenges and controversies in the management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Majid Shabbir; Oliver Kayes; Suks Minhas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  Organ-sparing procedures in GU cancer: part 2-organ-sparing procedures in testicular and penile tumors.

Authors:  Mohamed H Kamel; Mahmoud I Khalil; Ehab Eltahawy; Rodney Davis; Nabil K Bissada
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 6.  Review of penile reconstructive techniques.

Authors:  Sverrir Kristinsson; Mark Johnson; David Ralph
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 7.  Penile preserving surgery and surgical strategies to maximize penile form and function in penile cancer: recommendations from the United Kingdom experience.

Authors:  Paul K Hegarty; Majid Shabbir; Ben Hughes; Suks Minhas; Matthew Perry; Nicholas Watkin; David J Ralph
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  MRI of the penis.

Authors:  A Kirkham
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  [Local treatment of penile cancer].

Authors:  C Protzel; O W Hakenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Long-term outcomes for penile cancer patients presenting with advanced N3 disease requiring a myocutaneous flap reconstruction or primary closure-a retrospective single centre study.

Authors:  Hussain M Alnajjar; Findlay MacAskill; Michelle Christodoulidou; Ash Mosahebi; Clare Akers; Raj Nigam; Peter Malone; David Ralph; Anita Mitra; Asif Muneer
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.