Literature DB >> 26170981

Surgical treatment of primary disease for penile squamous cell carcinoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database analysis.

Yao Zhu1, Wei-Jie Gu1, Hong-Kai Wang1, Cheng-Yuan Gu1, Ding-Wei Ye1.   

Abstract

Current guidelines recommend penile sparing surgery (PSS) for selected penile cancer cases. The present study described the use of PSS in a population-based cohort, and also examined the role of PSS on penile cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were used to identify individuals that were diagnosed with penile squamous cell carcinoma between 1998 and 2009 and treated with surgery. Patients were sorted into two groups: Local tumor excision (LTE) and partial/total penectomy (PE). Factors associated with the receipt of LTE and PCSM following LTE were examined. In addition, PCSM was compared between LTE and PE following propensity score matching. Of the 1,292 eligible patients, 24.2% underwent LTE. For stage T1 disease, the rates of LTE increased moderately from 29 to 40% over the last decade. Following multivariate analyses, young age, African descent, a tumor size of <3 cm and stage T1 disease were identified to positively influence the receipt of LTE. With a median follow-up period of 55 months, the four-year PCSM rate was 9.8% in patients treated with LTE. Older age, a tumor size of 3-4 cm and regional/distant disease (SEER stage) were significant predictors of PCSM. Furthermore, in matched cohorts with stage T1 disease, the four-year PCSM rates were 8.9 and 10.0% for patients that received LTE or PE, respectively (P=0.93). In conclusion, underuse of PSS is pronounced in the general community with significant age and ethnicity disparities. The current population-based study provides evidence supporting the oncological safety of PSS compared with PE in early-stage disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SEER program; multivariate analysis; penile neoplasms; prognosis; surgery; survival

Year:  2015        PMID: 26170981      PMCID: PMC4487029          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.3221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  24 in total

1.  Increasing trends in the use of breast-conserving surgery in California.

Authors:  C R Morris; R Cohen; R Schlag; W E Wright
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Penile implant utilization following treatment for prostate cancer: analysis of the SEER-Medicare database.

Authors:  Raanan Tal; Lindsay M Jacks; Elena Elkin; John P Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  Penis conserving treatment for T1 and T2 penile carcinoma: clinical implications of a local recurrence.

Authors:  A P Lont; M P W Gallee; W Meinhardt; H van Tinteren; S Horenblas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Human papillomavirus as a prognostic factor in carcinoma of the penis: analysis of 82 patients treated with amputation and bilateral lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  A L Bezerra; A Lopes; G H Santiago; K C Ribeiro; M R Latorre; L L Villa
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Organ-sparing surgery for penile cancer: complications and outcomes.

Authors:  Jian Li; Yao Zhu; Shi-Lin Zhang; Chao-Fu Wang; Xu-Dong Yao; Bo Dai; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Long-term outcome of excisional organ sparing surgery for carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  Adam S Feldman; W Scott McDougal
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Glans-preserving surgery for superficial penile cancer.

Authors:  Pengchao Li; Ninghong Song; Changjun Yin; Wei Zhang; Jie Li; Lixin Hua; Zengjun Wang; Gong Cheng
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  2011-08-25

8.  The histological extent of the local spread of carcinoma of the penis and its therapeutic implications.

Authors:  A Agrawal; D Pai; N Ananthakrishnan; S R Smile; C Ratnakar
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 9.  Identifying the needs of penile cancer sufferers: a systematic review of the quality of life, psychosexual and psychosocial literature in penile cancer.

Authors:  Satish B Maddineni; Maurice M Lau; Vijay K Sangar
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Outcome of glansectomy and skin grafting in the management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Hugh F O'Kane; Ajay Pahuja; K J Ho; Ali Thwaini; Thaigarajan Nambirajan; Patrick Keane
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2011-04-04
View more
  2 in total

1.  Radical penectomy, a compromise for life: results from the PECAD study.

Authors:  Jamil Ghahhari; Michele Marchioni; Philippe E Spiess; Juan J Chipollini; Peter Nyirády; Judith Varga; Pasquale Ditonno; Stefano Boccasile; Giulia Primiceri; Cosimo De Nunzio; Giorgia Tema; Andrea Tubaro; Alessandro Veccia; Alessandro Antonelli; Gennaro Musi; Ottavio De Cobelli; Andrea Conti; Stefano Puliatti; Salvatore Micali; Mario Álvarez-Maestro; José Quesada Olarte; Erico Diogenes; Marcos Venicio Alves Lima; Andrew Tracey; Georgi Guruli; Riccardo Autorino; Petros Sountoulides; Roman Sosnowski; Luigi Schips; Luca Cindolo
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-06

2.  Penile cancer in Maranhão, Northeast Brazil: the highest incidence globally?

Authors:  Ronald Wagner Pereira Coelho; Jaqueline Diniz Pinho; Janise Silva Moreno; Dimitrius Vidal E Oliveira Garbis; Athiene Maniva Teixeira do Nascimento; Joyce Santos Larges; José Ribamar Rodrigues Calixto; Leandra Naira Zambelli Ramalho; Antônio Augusto Moura da Silva; Leudivan Ribeiro Nogueira; Laisson de Moura Feitoza; Gyl Eanes Barros Silva
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 2.264

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.