Literature DB >> 17348543

Spatial release from masking of aerial tones in pinnipeds.

Marla M Holt1, Ronald J Schusterman.   

Abstract

In most masking experiments, target signals and sound intended to mask are located in the same position. Spatial release from masking (SRM) occurs when signals and maskers are spatially separated, resulting in detection improvement relative to when they are spatially co-located. In this study, SRM was investigated in a harbor seal, who naturally lacks pinnae, and California sea lion, who possesses reduced pinnae. Subjects had to detect aerial tones at 1, 8, and 16 kHz in the presence of octave bands of white noise centered at the tone frequency. While the masker occurred in front of the subject (0 degree), the tone occurred at 0, 45, or 90 degrees in the horizontal plane. Unmasked thresholds were also measured at these angles to determine sensitivity differences based on source azimuth. Compared to when signal and masker where co-located, masked thresholds were lower by as much as 19 and 12 dB in the harbor seal and sea lion, respectively, when signal and masker were separated. Masked threshold differences of the harbor seal were larger than those previously measured under water. Performance was consistent with some measurements collected on terrestrial animals but differences between subjects at the highest frequency likely reflect variations in pinna anatomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17348543     DOI: 10.1121/1.2404929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

Review 1.  The possible effects of anthropogenic acoustic pollution on marine mammals' reproduction: an emerging threat to animal extinction.

Authors:  Ghulam Nabi; Richard William McLaughlin; Yujiang Hao; Kexiong Wang; Xianyuan Zeng; Suliman Khan; Ding Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Sound localization in noise by gerbils and humans.

Authors:  Andrea Lingner; Lutz Wiegrebe; Benedikt Grothe
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-01-14

3.  Spatial release from masking in a free-field source identification task by gray treefrogs.

Authors:  Vivek Nityananda; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Mechanisms of auditory masking in marine mammals.

Authors:  Brian K Branstetter; Jillian M Sills
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.899

5.  Inherent Directionality Determines Spatial Release from Masking at the Tympanum in a Vertebrate with Internally Coupled Ears.

Authors:  Michael S Caldwell; Norman Lee; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-28

Review 6.  The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it?

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Finding a mate at a cocktail party: Spatial release from masking improves acoustic mate recognition in grey treefrogs.

Authors:  Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Correlations between cochlear pathophysiology and behavioral measures of temporal and spatial processing in noise exposed macaques.

Authors:  Chase A Mackey; Jennifer McCrate; Kaitlyn S MacDonald; Jessica Feller; Leslie Liberman; M Charles Liberman; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  How spatial release from masking may fail to function in a highly directional auditory system.

Authors:  Norman Lee; Andrew C Mason
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Spatial release from masking in crocodilians.

Authors:  Julie Thévenet; Léo Papet; Zilca Campos; Michael Greenfield; Nicolas Boyer; Nicolas Grimault; Nicolas Mathevon
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-08-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.