Literature DB >> 22245918

Sound localization in noise by gerbils and humans.

Andrea Lingner1, Lutz Wiegrebe2, Benedikt Grothe2.   

Abstract

Detection and localization of a target sound in the presence of concurrent, spatially distributed masking sounds is one of the most challenging tasks for the mammalian auditory system. Previous studies demonstrated that the ability to localize signals is decreased by interfering noise. In order to directly compare the behavioral performance in a signal processing task in noise between gerbils and humans in the free sound field, we quantified their localization ability for a low-frequency signal in the presence of six masking noise sources surrounding the subject. Thresholds were measured both for masking noises that were correlated or uncorrelated across the masking sources. Overall, the gerbils required a higher signal/noise ratio to detect the low-frequency signal than the humans; that is, the behavioral performance of the gerbils was considerably worse than that of the humans. Moreover, switching from maskers that were uncorrelated across the masking sources to correlated maskers resulted in more masking in gerbils but in a release from masking in humans. These results would suggest that the gerbil may not be a good animal model for binaural processing. However, simulations of the localization thresholds in a numerical model of binaural processing in gerbils and humans reveal that both the inferior overall performance in gerbils and the opposite effect of masker correlation on the detection thresholds can be attributed to the smaller head size and the wider peripheral auditory filters in gerbils. Thus, the current data indicate that the binaural processor itself (i.e., the evaluation of signals coming from the two ears) is equally sensitive in gerbils and humans. However, the physical limitations imposed by the small head prevent the gerbil from performing equally well in the current paradigm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22245918      PMCID: PMC3298617          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-011-0301-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  28 in total

1.  Effects of stimulus intensity on sound localization in the horizontal and upper-hemispheric median plane.

Authors:  J Inoue
Journal:  J UOEH       Date:  2001-06-01

2.  Experience-dependent refinement of inhibitory inputs to auditory coincidence-detector neurons.

Authors:  Christoph Kapfer; Armin H Seidl; Hermann Schweizer; Benedikt Grothe
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Precise inhibition is essential for microsecond interaural time difference coding.

Authors:  Antje Brand; Oliver Behrend; Torsten Marquardt; David McAlpine; Benedikt Grothe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-05-30       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization revisited.

Authors:  Ewan A Macpherson; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Studies of binaural detection in the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) with Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  S J Early; C R Mason; L Zheng; M Evilsizer; F Idrobo; J M Harrison; L H Carney
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Hearing sensitivity of the mongolian gerbil, Meriones unguiculatis.

Authors:  A Ryan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Sound localization and use of binaural cues by the gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus).

Authors:  R S Heffner; H E Heffner
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Detection of binaurally masked tones by the cat.

Authors:  O S Wakeford; D E Robinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Localization of aerial broadband noise by pinnipeds.

Authors:  Marla M Holt; Ronald J Schusterman; Brandon L Southall; David Kastak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  9 in total

1.  Relative sound localisation abilities in human listeners.

Authors:  Katherine C Wood; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of forward masking on sound localization in cats: basic findings with broadband maskers.

Authors:  Yan Gai; Janet L Ruhland; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The neural representation of interaural time differences in gerbils is transformed from midbrain to cortex.

Authors:  Lucile A C Belliveau; Dmitry R Lyamzin; Nicholas A Lesica
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Spatial hearing in Cope's gray treefrog: I. Open and closed loop experiments on sound localization in the presence and absence of noise.

Authors:  Michael S Caldwell; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  The interaural time difference pathway: a comparison of spectral bandwidth and correlation sensitivity at three anatomical levels.

Authors:  Myles McLaughlin; Tom P Franken; Marcel van der Heijden; Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-09

6.  Spatial and temporal disparity in signals and maskers affects signal detection in non-human primates.

Authors:  Francesca Rocchi; Margit E Dylla; Peter A Bohlen; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Developmental Conductive Hearing Loss Reduces Modulation Masking Release.

Authors:  Antje Ihlefeld; Yi-Wen Chen; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  A Temporal Filter for Binaural Hearing Is Dynamically Adjusted by Sound Pressure Level.

Authors:  Ida Siveke; Andrea Lingner; Julian J Ammer; Sarah A Gleiss; Benedikt Grothe; Felix Felmy
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.492

9.  Optogenetic Control of Neural Circuits in the Mongolian Gerbil.

Authors:  Stefan Keplinger; Barbara Beiderbeck; Stylianos Michalakis; Martin Biel; Benedikt Grothe; Lars Kunz
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 5.505

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.