Literature DB >> 17346758

Reinforcer-specificity of appetitive and consummatory behavior of rats after Pavlovian conditioning with food reinforcers.

Ezequiel M Galarce1, Hans S Crombag, Peter C Holland.   

Abstract

We examined the reinforcer-specificity of Pavlovian conditioning in the control of appetitive and consummatory behaviors in Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer, cue-potentiated eating, and devaluation procedures. Rats received pairings of one conditioned stimulus with sucrose and another conditioned stimulus with maltodextrin. In Experiment 1, rats were also trained to earn sucrose for one instrumental response and maltodextrin for another. In a transfer test, the Pavlovian cues enhanced the rate of instrumental responding more when the food reinforcer predicted by the instrumental response and the Pavlovian cue were consistent than when they were inconsistent, but both cues enhanced both responses. In Experiment 2, sated rats' consumption of each food was potentiated in the presence of a cue for that food, but not in the presence of a cue for the other food. In Experiment 3, one food was devalued by pairing it with lithium chloride, prior to testing food consumption and food-cup directed behaviors. The food cues selectively controlled food-cup related behaviors, regardless of the presence of the devalued or nondevalued foods in the food cup. Together, these results are consistent with the view that conditioned cues modulate appetitive and consummatory behaviors with increasing levels of specificity. The closer an action comes to ingestion, the more it is controlled by sensory properties conveyed by learned cues. These data are discussed in the context of allostatic regulation of food foraging and intake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17346758      PMCID: PMC1904483          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.01.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  31 in total

1.  Lesions of the basolateral amygdala disrupt selective aspects of reinforcer representation in rats.

Authors:  P Blundell; G Hall; S Killcross
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Amygdalo-hypothalamic circuit allows learned cues to override satiety and promote eating.

Authors:  Gorica D Petrovich; Barry Setlow; Peter C Holland; Michela Gallagher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The specificity of restrained versus unrestrained eaters' responses to food cues: general desire to eat, or craving for the cued food?

Authors:  Ingrid Fedoroff; Janet Polivy; C Peter Herman
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Relations between Pavlovian-instrumental transfer and reinforcer devaluation.

Authors:  Peter C Holland
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2004-04

Review 5.  Signals that influence food intake and body weight.

Authors:  Stephen C Woods
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2005-11-02

6.  Rats with basolateral amygdala lesions show normal increases in conditioned stimulus processing but reduced conditioned potentiation of eating.

Authors:  P C Holland; T Hatfield; M Gallagher
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 7.  The non-regulation of food intake in humans: hope for reversing the epidemic of obesity.

Authors:  David A Levitsky
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2005-11-02

8.  The effects of amygdala lesions on conditioned stimulus-potentiated eating in rats.

Authors:  Peter C Holland; Gorica D Petrovich; Michela Gallagher
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2002-05-01

9.  Double dissociation of the effects of lesions of basolateral and central amygdala on conditioned stimulus-potentiated feeding and Pavlovian-instrumental transfer.

Authors:  Peter C Holland; Michela Gallagher
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Involvement of the central nucleus of the amygdala and nucleus accumbens core in mediating Pavlovian influences on instrumental behaviour.

Authors:  J Hall; J A Parkinson; T M Connor; A Dickinson; B J Everitt
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.386

View more
  20 in total

1.  Learned food-cue stimulates persistent feeding in sated rats.

Authors:  Christina J Reppucci; Gorica D Petrovich
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Withdrawal from free-choice high-fat high-sugar diet induces craving only in obesity-prone animals.

Authors:  Chris Pickering; Johan Alsiö; Anna-Lena Hulting; Helgi B Schiöth
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Blaming the Brain for Obesity: Integration of Hedonic and Homeostatic Mechanisms.

Authors:  Hans-Rudolf Berthoud; Heike Münzberg; Christopher D Morrison
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  The influence of CS-US interval on several different indices of learning in appetitive conditioning.

Authors:  Andrew R Delamater; Peter C Holland
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2008-04

5.  Extended exposure to environmental cues, but not to sucrose, reduces sucrose cue reactivity in rats.

Authors:  John H Harkness; Jason Wells; Sierra Webb; Jeffrey W Grimm
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Implications of learning theory for developing programs to decrease overeating.

Authors:  Kerri N Boutelle; Mark E Bouton
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Junk-food enhances conditioned food cup approach to a previously established food cue, but does not alter cue potentiated feeding; implications for the effects of palatable diets on incentive motivation.

Authors:  Rifka C Derman; Carrie R Ferrario
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-03-16

8.  Sucrose taste but not Polycose taste conditions flavor preferences in rats.

Authors:  Kristine B Bonacchi; Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-06-17

9.  Cognitive versus stimulus-response theories of learning.

Authors:  Peter C Holland
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  Decreased firing of striatal neurons related to licking during acquisition and overtraining of a licking task.

Authors:  Chris C Tang; David H Root; Dawn C Duke; Yun Zhu; Kate Teixeria; Sisi Ma; David J Barker; Mark O West
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.