Literature DB >> 17346609

A one-item question with a Likert or Visual Analog Scale adequately measured current anxiety.

Heather M Davey1, Alexandra L Barratt, Phyllis N Butow, Jonathan J Deeks.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a single question with a Likert Scale or a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) response adequately measures current anxiety. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Consecutive English-speaking adult women attending a dedicated breast clinic in a major Australian city were invited to complete a demographic questionnaire, the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and a single question with a five-point Likert Scale response and a VAS in random order. Only women who completed the STAI were included in analyses.
RESULTS: Four hundred of 497 (80%) eligible women agreed to participate. Both measures were adequate predictors of the STAI score; correlation with STAI was 0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.82) for the VAS and 0.75 (95% CI 0.70-0.79) for the Likert Scale. However, 11% of women incorrectly completed the VAS limiting its usefulness.
CONCLUSION: A single question with either a Likert Scale or VAS response may be an adequate replacement for the STAI. Both measures quickly and easily assess anxiety and may be useful for research purposes when researchers have very limited time or questionnaire space or need to reduce the burden on participants of completing many measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17346609     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  69 in total

1.  Are Single-Item Global Ratings Useful for Assessing Health Status?

Authors:  Cathaleene Macias; Paul B Gold; Dost Öngür; Bruce M Cohen; Trishan Panch
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2015-10-22

2.  Testing the cross-stressor hypothesis under real-world conditions: exercise as a moderator of the association between momentary anxiety and cardiovascular responses.

Authors:  Ipek Ensari; Joseph E Schwartz; Donald Edmondson; Andrea T Duran; Daichi Shimbo; Keith M Diaz
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2020-04-22

3.  The relationship of the audible pop to hypoalgesia associated with high-velocity, low-amplitude thrust manipulation: a secondary analysis of an experimental study in pain-free participants.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Michael E Robinson; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.437

4.  Screening and offering online programs for eating disorders: Reach, pathology, and differences across eating disorder status groups at 28 U.S. universities.

Authors:  Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft; Katherine N Balantekin; Dawn M Eichen; Andrea K Graham; Grace E Monterubio; Shiri Sadeh-Sharvit; Neha J Goel; Rachael E Flatt; Kristina Saffran; Anna M Karam; Marie-Laure Firebaugh; Mickey Trockel; C Barr Taylor; Denise E Wilfley
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.861

5.  Randomized trial of a web-based tool for prolapse: impact on patient understanding and provider counseling.

Authors:  Erinn M Myers; Barbara L Robinson; Elizabeth J Geller; Ellen Wells; Catherine A Matthews; Jacquia L Fenderson; Andrea K Crane; Mary Jannelli; AnnaMarie Connolly
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Worry, worry attacks, and PTSD among Cambodian refugees: a path analysis investigation.

Authors:  Devon E Hinton; Angela Nickerson; Richard A Bryant
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  A comparison of the scaling properties of the English, Spanish, French, and Chinese EQ-5D descriptive systems.

Authors:  Nan Luo; Minghui Li; Julie Chevalier; Andrew Lloyd; Michael Herdman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-12-25       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Master resilience training and its relationship to individual well-being and stress buffering among army national guard soldiers.

Authors:  James Griffith; Courtney West
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.505

9.  Safety and Acceptability of Patient-Administered Sedatives During Mechanical Ventilation.

Authors:  Linda L Chlan; Debra J Skaar; Mary F Tracy; Sarah M Hayes; Breanna D Hetland; Kay Savik; Craig R Weinert
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.228

10.  Prediction of preoperative anxiety in children: who is most accurate?

Authors:  Jill E MacLaren; Caitlin Thompson; Megan Weinberg; Michelle A Fortier; Debra E Morrison; Danielle Perret; Zeev N Kain
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.108

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.