Literature DB >> 17344542

Learning about multiple attributes of reward in Pavlovian conditioning.

Andrew R Delamater1, Stephen Oakeshott.   

Abstract

The nature of the reward representation in Pavlovian conditioning has been of perennial interest to students of associative learning theory. We consider the view that it consists of a range of different attributes, each of which may be governed by different learning rules. We investigated this issue through a series of experiments using a time-sensitive Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer procedure, aiming to dissociate learning about temporal and specific sensory features of a reward. Our results successfully demonstrated that learning about these different features appears to be dissociable, with learning about the specific sensory features of a Pavlovian unconditioned stimulus (US) occurring very rapidly across a wide range of experimental procedures, while learning about the temporal features of the US occurred slightly less quickly and was more sensitive to parametric disruption. These results are discussed with regard to the potential independence or interdependence of the relevant learning processes, and to some recent neurophysiological recording and brain lesion work, which provide additional means to investigate these dissociations.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17344542     DOI: 10.1196/annals.1390.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  30 in total

1.  Posttraining flavor exposure in hungry rats after simultaneous conditioning with a nutrient converts the CS into a conditioned inhibitor.

Authors:  David Garcia-Burgos; Felisa González
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 2.  The Origins and Organization of Vertebrate Pavlovian Conditioning.

Authors:  Michael S Fanselow; Kate M Wassum
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Pavlovian influences on goal-directed behavior in mice: the role of cue-reinforcer relations.

Authors:  Hans S Crombag; Ezequiel M Galarce; Peter C Holland
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 4.  Re-valuing the amygdala.

Authors:  Sara E Morrison; C Daniel Salzman
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Basolateral Amygdala to Orbitofrontal Cortex Projections Enable Cue-Triggered Reward Expectations.

Authors:  Nina T Lichtenberg; Zachary T Pennington; Sandra M Holley; Venuz Y Greenfield; Carlos Cepeda; Michael S Levine; Kate M Wassum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Disruptive effect of amphetamines on Pavlovian to instrumental transfer.

Authors:  Darien A Hall; Joshua M Gulley
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Extinction of specific stimulus-outcome (S-O) associations in Pavlovian learning with an extended CS procedure.

Authors:  Andrew R Delamater; Kevin Schneider; Rifka C Derman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.478

Review 8.  Associative and temporal processes: a dual process approach.

Authors:  Andrew R Delamater; Alex Desouza; Yosef Rivkin; Rifka Derman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  The Role of the Rodent Lateral Orbitofrontal Cortex in Simple Pavlovian Cue-Outcome Learning Depends on Training Experience.

Authors:  Marios C Panayi; Simon Killcross
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2021-02-09

Review 10.  Psychological and neural mechanisms of experimental extinction: a selective review.

Authors:  Andrew R Delamater; R Frederick Westbrook
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 2.877

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.