Literature DB >> 28743727

Basolateral Amygdala to Orbitofrontal Cortex Projections Enable Cue-Triggered Reward Expectations.

Nina T Lichtenberg1, Zachary T Pennington1, Sandra M Holley2, Venuz Y Greenfield1, Carlos Cepeda2, Michael S Levine2,3, Kate M Wassum4,3.   

Abstract

To make an appropriate decision, one must anticipate potential future rewarding events, even when they are not readily observable. These expectations are generated by using observable information (e.g., stimuli or available actions) to retrieve often quite detailed memories of available rewards. The basolateral amygdala (BLA) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) are two reciprocally connected key nodes in the circuitry supporting such outcome-guided behaviors. But there is much unknown about the contribution of this circuit to decision making, and almost nothing known about the whether any contribution is via direct, monosynaptic projections, or the direction of information transfer. Therefore, here we used designer receptor-mediated inactivation of OFC→BLA or BLA→OFC projections to evaluate their respective contributions to outcome-guided behaviors in rats. Inactivation of BLA terminals in the OFC, but not OFC terminals in the BLA, disrupted the selective motivating influence of cue-triggered reward representations over reward-seeking decisions as assayed by Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer. BLA→OFC projections were also required when a cued reward representation was used to modify Pavlovian conditional goal-approach responses according to the reward's current value. These projections were not necessary when actions were guided by reward expectations generated based on learned action-reward contingencies, or when rewards themselves, rather than stored memories, directed action. These data demonstrate that BLA→OFC projections enable the cue-triggered reward expectations that can motivate the execution of specific action plans and allow adaptive conditional responding.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Deficits anticipating potential future rewarding events are associated with many psychiatric diseases. Presently, we know little about the neural circuits supporting such reward expectation. Here we show that basolateral amygdala to orbitofrontal cortex projections are required for expectations of specific available rewards to influence reward seeking and decision making. The necessity of these projections was limited to situations in which expectations were elicited by reward-predictive cues. These projections therefore facilitate adaptive behavior by enabling the orbitofrontal cortex to use environmental stimuli to generate expectations of potential future rewarding events.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/378374-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DREADD; Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer; chemogenetics; devaluation; hM4Di; reinstatement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28743727      PMCID: PMC5577854          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0486-17.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  88 in total

1.  What and when to "want"? Amygdala-based focusing of incentive salience upon sugar and sex.

Authors:  Stephen V Mahler; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  The contribution of orbitofrontal cortex to action selection.

Authors:  Sean B Ostlund; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Amygdala neurons differentially encode motivation and reinforcement.

Authors:  Kay M Tye; Patricia H Janak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Goal-directed instrumental action: contingency and incentive learning and their cortical substrates.

Authors:  B W Balleine; A Dickinson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  1998 Apr-May       Impact factor: 5.250

5.  Orbitofrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala encode expected outcomes during learning.

Authors:  G Schoenbaum; A A Chiba; M Gallagher
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 6.  On the nature of CS and US representations in Pavlovian learning.

Authors:  Andrew R Delamater
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Differential involvement of the basolateral amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex in the formation of sensory-specific associations in conditioned flavor preference and magazine approach paradigms.

Authors:  Janina Scarlet; Andrew R Delamater; Vincent Campese; Matthew Fein; Daniel S Wheeler
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Distinct opioid circuits determine the palatability and the desirability of rewarding events.

Authors:  K M Wassum; S B Ostlund; N T Maidment; B W Balleine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Contributions of the amygdala to reward expectancy and choice signals in human prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Alan N Hampton; Ralph Adolphs; Michael J Tyszka; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Orbitofrontal neurons acquire responses to 'valueless' Pavlovian cues during unblocking.

Authors:  Michael A McDannald; Guillem R Esber; Meredyth A Wegener; Heather M Wied; Tzu-Lan Liu; Thomas A Stalnaker; Joshua L Jones; Jason Trageser; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  76 in total

1.  Effects of hM4Di activation in CamKII basolateral amygdala neurons and CNO treatment on sensory-specific vs. general PIT: refining PIT circuits and considerations for using CNO.

Authors:  Rifka C Derman; Caroline E Bass; Carrie R Ferrario
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Specializations for reward-guided decision-making in the primate ventral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Murray; Peter H Rudebeck
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 3.  The orbitofrontal cortex, food intake and obesity

Authors:  Lauren T. Seabrook; Stephanie L. Borgland
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 6.186

4.  Role of mPFC and nucleus accumbens circuitry in modulation of a nicotine plus alcohol compound drug state.

Authors:  Patrick A Randall; Zoe A McElligott; Joyce Besheer
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 4.280

5.  Disconnection of basolateral amygdala and insular cortex disrupts conditioned approach in Pavlovian lever autoshaping.

Authors:  Helen M Nasser; Danielle S Lafferty; Ellen N Lesser; Sam Z Bacharach; Donna J Calu
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.877

6.  CNO Evil? Considerations for the Use of DREADDs in Behavioral Neuroscience.

Authors:  Stephen V Mahler; Gary Aston-Jones
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 7.  The use of chemogenetics in behavioural neuroscience: receptor variants, targeting approaches and caveats.

Authors:  Erin J Campbell; Nathan J Marchant
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 8.  The role of the orbitofrontal cortex in alcohol use, abuse, and dependence.

Authors:  David E Moorman
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 5.067

9.  Chemogenetic Manipulations of Ventral Tegmental Area Dopamine Neurons Reveal Multifaceted Roles in Cocaine Abuse.

Authors:  Stephen V Mahler; Zachary D Brodnik; Brittney M Cox; William C Buchta; Brandon S Bentzley; Julian Quintanilla; Zackary A Cope; Edwin C Lin; Matthew D Riedy; Michael D Scofield; Justin Messinger; Christina M Ruiz; Arthur C Riegel; Rodrigo A España; Gary Aston-Jones
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Oral application of clozapine-N-oxide using the micropipette-guided drug administration (MDA) method in mouse DREADD systems.

Authors:  Sina M Schalbetter; Flavia S Mueller; Joseph Scarborough; Juliet Richetto; Ulrike Weber-Stadlbauer; Urs Meyer; Tina Notter
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 12.625

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.