Literature DB >> 17344361

Comparison of the SPF10-LiPA system to the Hybrid Capture 2 Assay for detection of carcinogenic human papillomavirus genotypes among 5,683 young women in Guanacaste, Costa Rica.

Mahboobeh Safaeian1, Rolando Herrero, Allan Hildesheim, Wim Quint, Enrique Freer, Leen-Jan Van Doorn, Carolina Porras, Sandra Silva, Paula González, M Concepcion Bratti, Ana Cecilia Rodriguez, Philip Castle.   

Abstract

The objective of this analysis was to compare the performance characteristics of two human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA detections assays, the Hybrid Capture 2 assay (HC2) and the SPF(10) assay, for the detection of carcinogenic HPV. Data are from the enrollment visits of women who participated in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III HPV16/18 Vaccine Trial in Guanacaste, Costa Rica. We compared the results of HC2 and SPF(10) testing of cervical specimens. Since the line probe assay (LiPA) detection system does not distinguish between HPV type 68 (HPV68; which is targeted by HC2) and HPV73 (which is not targeted by HC2), for SPF(10)-LiPA, we defined the carcinogenic HPV types as the 12 HC2-targeted types (types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, and 59), HPV68/73, and the HC2-cross-reactive, carcinogenic type HPV66. The kappa values and the performance characteristics for the detection of cervical abnormalities were ascertained. Paired observations were available for 5,683 sexually active, young women (median age, 21 years). The prevalence of carcinogenic HPV types was 35% (n=1,962) by HC2 and 35% (n=2,003) by SPF(10)-LiPA. There were no differences in the prevalence of carcinogenic HPV types by HC2 and SPF(10)-LiPA among women with normal, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology. Among women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology, HC2 was more likely to test positive than SPF(10)-LiPA for the carcinogenic HPV types (87% and 79%, respectively; P=0.001) as a result of HC2 cross-reactivity with HPV types 40, 43, 44, 53, 54, 60, 70, and 74. The crude agreement between the two assays was 88%, with a kappa value of 0.75 (95% confidence limits, 0.73 to 0.76). We observed very good agreement between HC2 and SPF(10)-LiPA for carcinogenic HPV type detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17344361      PMCID: PMC1865890          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02580-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  26 in total

1.  Improved amplification of genital human papillomaviruses.

Authors:  P E Gravitt; C L Peyton; T Q Alessi; C M Wheeler; F Coutlée; A Hildesheim; M H Schiffman; D R Scott; R J Apple
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Detection of high-risk HPV types by the hybrid capture 2 test.

Authors:  G Terry; L Ho; P Londesborough; J Cuzick; I Mielzynska-Lohnas; A Lorincz
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.327

3.  Re: Cervical carcinoma and human papillomavirus: on the road to preventing a major human cancer.

Authors:  F X Bosch; N Muñoz; S de Sanjosé; E L Franco; D R Lowy; M Schiffman; S Franceschi; S K Kjaer; C J Meijer; I H Frazer; J Cuzick
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-09-05       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Hybrid Capture II HPV Test detects at least 15 human papillomavirus genotypes not included in its current high-risk probe cocktail.

Authors:  Mario Poljak; Irena J Marin; Katja Seme; Adriana Vince
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.168

5.  The sexually transmitted disease model for cervical cancer: incoherent epidemiologic findings and the role of misclassification of human papillomavirus infection.

Authors:  E L Franco
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Relationships of human papillomavirus type, qualitative viral load, and age with cytologic abnormality.

Authors:  Melinda Butsch Kovacic; Philip E Castle; Rolando Herrero; Mark Schiffman; Mark E Sherman; Sholom Wacholder; Ana C Rodriguez; Martha L Hutchinson; M Concepción Bratti; Allan Hildesheim; Jorge Morales; Mario Alfaro; Robert D Burk
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Restricted cross-reactivity of hybrid capture 2 with nononcogenic human papillomavirus types.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Mark Schiffman; Robert D Burk; Sholom Wacholder; Allan Hildesheim; Rolando Herrero; M Concepcion Bratti; Mark E Sherman; Attila Lorincz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 8.  Measurement errors in epidemiological studies of human papillomavirus and cervical cancer.

Authors:  E L Franco
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1992

9.  Test reliability is critically important to molecular epidemiology: an example from studies of human papillomavirus infection and cervical neoplasia.

Authors:  M H Schiffman; A Schatzkin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  Chapter 12: Human papillomavirus technologies.

Authors:  Thomas Iftner; Luisa Lina Villa
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2003
View more
  33 in total

1.  Evaluation of the polyclonal ELISA HPV serology assay as a biomarker for human papillomavirus exposure.

Authors:  Sarah E Coseo; Carolina Porras; Lori E Dodd; Allan Hildesheim; Ana Cecilia Rodriguez; Mark Schiffman; Rolando Herrero; Sholom Wacholder; Paula Gonzalez; Mark E Sherman; Silvia Jimenez; Diane Solomon; Catherine Bougelet; Leen-Jan van Doorn; Wim Quint; Mahboobeh Safaeian
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.830

2.  Evaluation of different techniques for identification of human papillomavirus types of low prevalence.

Authors:  Ivan Sabol; Martina Salakova; Jana Smahelova; Michal Pawlita; Markus Schmitt; Nina Milutin Gasperov; Magdalena Grce; Ruth Tachezy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Validation of a low-cost human papillomavirus genotyping assay based on PGMY PCR and reverse blotting hybridization with reusable membranes.

Authors:  C Estrade; P-A Menoud; D Nardelli-Haefliger; R Sahli
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Clinical impact of the analytical specificity of the hybrid capture 2 test: data from the New Technologies for Cervical Cancer (NTCC) study.

Authors:  Anna Gillio-Tos; Laura De Marco; Francesca Maria Carozzi; Annarosa Del Mistro; Salvatore Girlando; Elena Burroni; Helena Frayle-Salamanca; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Paola Pierotti; Guglielmo Ronco
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Clinical performance of the PreTect HPV-Proofer E6/E7 mRNA assay in comparison with that of the Hybrid Capture 2 test for identification of women at risk of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Samuel Ratnam; Francois Coutlee; Dan Fontaine; James Bentley; Nicholas Escott; Prafull Ghatage; Veeresh Gadag; Glen Holloway; Elias Bartellas; Nick Kum; Christopher Giede; Adrian Lear
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of hybrid capture II, linear array, and a bead-based multiplex genotyping assay for detection of human papillomavirus in women with negative pap test results and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Manola Comar; Michelle R Iannacone; Giorgia Casalicchio; Sandrine McKay-Chopin; Massimo Tommasino; Tarik Gheit
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of linear array and line blot assay for detection of human papillomavirus and diagnosis of cervical precancer and cancer in the atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion triage study.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Patti E Gravitt; Diane Solomon; Cosette M Wheeler; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Human papillomavirus genotype specificity of hybrid capture 2 low-risk probe cocktail.

Authors:  Mario Poljak; Bostjan J Kocjan; Anja Kovanda; Maja M Lunar; Snjezana Zidovec Lepej; Ana Planinic; Katja Seme; Adriana Vince
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Patterns of persistent genital human papillomavirus infection among women worldwide: a literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anne F Rositch; Jill Koshiol; Michael G Hudgens; Hilda Razzaghi; Danielle M Backes; Jeanne M Pimenta; Eduardo L Franco; Charles Poole; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Human papillomavirus genotype specificity of hybrid capture 2.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Diane Solomon; Cosette M Wheeler; Patti E Gravitt; Sholom Wacholder; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.