Literature DB >> 17343945

Sensitivity of muscle force estimates to variations in muscle-tendon properties.

Christian Redl1, Margit Gfoehler, Marcus G Pandy.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity of muscle force estimates to changes in some of the parameters which are commonly used to describe models of muscle-tendon actuation. The sensitivity analysis was performed on three parameters: optimal muscle-fiber length, muscle physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA), and tendon rest length. The muscles selected for the analysis were posterior gluteus medius/minimus, vasti, soleus, and sartorius. Each parameter was perturbed from its nominal value, and an optimization problem was solved to determine the relative influence of each parameter on the calculated values of muscle force. Muscle forces were calculated for a simulated cycle of normal walking. Parameter sensitivity was quantified using two new metrics: an integrated sensitivity ratio, which quantified the effect of changing a single parameter for any muscle on the time history of force developed by that muscle; and a summed cross-sensitivity ratio, which quantified the effect of changing one parameter for any muscle on the time histories of forces developed by all of the other muscles. The results showed that muscle force estimates for walking are most sensitive to changes in tendon rest length and least sensitive to changes in muscle PCSA. For soleus, for example, the integrated sensitivity ratios for tendon rest length were an order of magnitude greater than those for muscle-fiber length and PCSA. For vasti, the integrated sensitivity ratios for tendon rest length were twice as large as those for muscle-fiber length and nearly an order of magnitude greater than those for PCSA. Overall, changes in the tendon rest lengths of vasti and soleus and changes in the fiber length of vasti were most critical to model estimates of muscle force. Our results emphasize the importance of obtaining accurate estimates of tendon rest length and muscle-fiber length, particularly for those actuators that function as prime movers during locomotion (gluteus maximus, gluteus medius/minimus, vasti, soleus, and gastrocnemius).

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17343945     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  18 in total

1.  Prediction of In Vivo Knee Joint Loads Using a Global Probabilistic Analysis.

Authors:  Alessandro Navacchia; Casey A Myers; Paul J Rullkoetter; Kevin B Shelburne
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Improving Musculoskeletal Model Scaling Using an Anatomical Atlas: The Importance of Gender and Anthropometric Similarity to Quantify Joint Reaction Forces.

Authors:  Ziyun Ding; Chui K Tsang; Daniel Nolte; Angela E Kedgley; Anthony M J Bull
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hicks; Thomas K Uchida; Ajay Seth; Apoorva Rajagopal; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Global sensitivity analysis of the joint kinematics during gait to the parameters of a lower limb multi-body model.

Authors:  Aimad El Habachi; Florent Moissenet; Sonia Duprey; Laurence Cheze; Raphaël Dumas
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Physiological and biochemical characteristics of skeletal muscles in sedentary and active rats.

Authors:  Hongyang Xu; Xiaoyu Ren; Graham D Lamb; Robyn M Murphy
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Sensitivity of estimated muscle force in forward simulation of normal walking.

Authors:  Ming Xiao; Jill Higginson
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.833

7.  An analytical approach to the problem of inverse optimization with additive objective functions: an application to human prehension.

Authors:  Alexander V Terekhov; Yakov B Pesin; Xun Niu; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.259

8.  Neuromusculoskeletal Model Calibration Significantly Affects Predicted Knee Contact Forces for Walking.

Authors:  Gil Serrancolí; Allison L Kinney; Benjamin J Fregly; Josep M Font-Llagunes
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Muscle moment arms and sensitivity analysis of a mouse hindlimb musculoskeletal model.

Authors:  James P Charles; Ornella Cappellari; Andrew J Spence; Dominic J Wells; John R Hutchinson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Body size and lower limb posture during walking in humans.

Authors:  Martin Hora; Libor Soumar; Herman Pontzer; Vladimír Sládek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.