Literature DB >> 19902213

An analytical approach to the problem of inverse optimization with additive objective functions: an application to human prehension.

Alexander V Terekhov1, Yakov B Pesin, Xun Niu, Mark L Latash, Vladimir M Zatsiorsky.   

Abstract

We consider the problem of what is being optimized in human actions with respect to various aspects of human movements and different motor tasks. From the mathematical point of view this problem consists of finding an unknown objective function given the values at which it reaches its minimum. This problem is called the inverse optimization problem. Until now the main approach to this problems has been the cut-and-try method, which consists of introducing an objective function and checking how it reflects the experimental data. Using this approach, different objective functions have been proposed for the same motor action. In the current paper we focus on inverse optimization problems with additive objective functions and linear constraints. Such problems are typical in human movement science. The problem of muscle (or finger) force sharing is an example. For such problems we obtain sufficient conditions for uniqueness and propose a method for determining the objective functions. To illustrate our method we analyze the problem of force sharing among the fingers in a grasping task. We estimate the objective function from the experimental data and show that it can predict the force-sharing pattern for a vast range of external forces and torques applied to the grasped object. The resulting objective function is quadratic with essentially non-zero linear terms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19902213      PMCID: PMC2888771          DOI: 10.1007/s00285-009-0306-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  31 in total

Review 1.  Optimization-based models of muscle coordination.

Authors:  Boris I Prilutsky; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.230

2.  Prehension synergies: trial-to-trial variability and hierarchical organization of stable performance.

Authors:  Jae K Shim; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Synthesis of standing-up trajectories using dynamic optimization.

Authors:  Jernej Kuzelicki; Milos Zefran; Helena Burger; Tadej Bajd
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Prehension synergies during nonvertical grasping, II: Modeling and optimization.

Authors:  Todd C Pataky; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Sensitivity of muscle force estimations to changes in muscle input parameters using nonlinear optimization approaches.

Authors:  W Herzog
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Sensitivity of muscle force estimates to variations in muscle-tendon properties.

Authors:  Christian Redl; Margit Gfoehler; Marcus G Pandy
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 2.161

7.  On the cost functions for the control of the human arm movement.

Authors:  H Cruse; E Wischmeyer; M Brüwer; P Brockfeld; A Dress
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Modelling velocity profiles of rapid movements: a comparative study.

Authors:  R Plamondon; A M Alimi; P Yergeau; F Leclerc
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The formation of trajectories during goal-oriented locomotion in humans. II. A maximum smoothness model.

Authors:  Quang-Cuong Pham; Halim Hicheur; Gustavo Arechavaleta; Jean-Paul Laumond; Alain Berthoz
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.386

View more
  24 in total

1.  Age-related changes in optimality and motor variability: an example of multifinger redundant tasks.

Authors:  Jaebum Park; Yao Sun; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Optimality vs. variability: an example of multi-finger redundant tasks.

Authors:  Jaebum Park; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Reproducibility and variability of the cost functions reconstructed from experimental recordings in multifinger prehension.

Authors:  Xun Niu; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 4.  Towards physics of neural processes and behavior.

Authors:  Mark L Latash
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 5.  The bliss (not the problem) of motor abundance (not redundancy).

Authors:  Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Reconstruction of the unknown optimization cost functions from experimental recordings during static multi-finger prehension.

Authors:  Xun Niu; Alexander V Terekhov; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 1.422

7.  Force-stabilizing synergies in motor tasks involving two actors.

Authors:  Stanislaw Solnik; Sasha Reschechtko; Yen-Hsun Wu; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Optimality versus variability: effect of fatigue in multi-finger redundant tasks.

Authors:  Jaebum Park; Tarkeshwar Singh; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Analytical and numerical analysis of inverse optimization problems: conditions of uniqueness and computational methods.

Authors:  Alexander V Terekhov; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  End-state comfort and joint configuration variance during reaching.

Authors:  Stanislaw Solnik; Nemanja Pazin; Chase J Coelho; David A Rosenbaum; John P Scholz; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.