PURPOSE: Primary care clinicians rely, perhaps erroneously, on general population-based data about risk factors to help form their strategies for allocating time in the brief primary care encounter. We conducted a case study using rates of tobacco usage among people presenting for primary care to explore comparability to general population-based rates. METHODS: Clinicians in RIOS Net, a practice-based research network, gathered data on tobacco use for all patients presenting during a 2-week period. We compared those data to population-based data by gender and ethnicity. RESULTS: Ninety-one primary care clinicians reported data on 2442 patients. Primary care smoking rates differed in important ways from general population-based rates. Hispanic women smoked at more than twice the national population-based rate (25% vs 12%). Youth smoked at higher rates as well, particularly young Native American men. CONCLUSIONS: Patients seen in primary care differ in important ways in rates and patterns of tobacco usage when compared with rates reported in population-based surveys. These differences could have important implications for preventive care within the context of multiple competing demands in the primary care encounter.
PURPOSE: Primary care clinicians rely, perhaps erroneously, on general population-based data about risk factors to help form their strategies for allocating time in the brief primary care encounter. We conducted a case study using rates of tobacco usage among people presenting for primary care to explore comparability to general population-based rates. METHODS: Clinicians in RIOS Net, a practice-based research network, gathered data on tobacco use for all patients presenting during a 2-week period. We compared those data to population-based data by gender and ethnicity. RESULTS: Ninety-one primary care clinicians reported data on 2442 patients. Primary care smoking rates differed in important ways from general population-based rates. Hispanic women smoked at more than twice the national population-based rate (25% vs 12%). Youth smoked at higher rates as well, particularly young Native American men. CONCLUSIONS:Patients seen in primary care differ in important ways in rates and patterns of tobacco usage when compared with rates reported in population-based surveys. These differences could have important implications for preventive care within the context of multiple competing demands in the primary care encounter.
Authors: Alex H Krist; Steven H Woolf; Camille Hochheimer; Roy T Sabo; Paulette Kashiri; Resa M Jones; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Rebecca S Etz; Shin-Ping Tu Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Alex H Krist; Steven H Woolf; Ghalib A Bello; Roy T Sabo; Daniel R Longo; Paulette Kashiri; Rebecca S Etz; John Loomis; Stephen F Rothemich; J Eric Peele; Jeffrey Cohn Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2014 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: John M Westfall; Linda Zittleman; Elizabeth W Staton; Bennett Parnes; Peter C Smith; Linda J Niebauer; Douglas H Fernald; Javan Quintela; Rebecca F Van Vorst; L Miriam Dickinson; Wilson D Pace Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2011 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Brian M Shelley; Andrew L Sussman; Robert L Williams; Alissa R Segal; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2009 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Alex H Krist; Eric Peele; Steven H Woolf; Stephen F Rothemich; John F Loomis; Daniel R Longo; Anton J Kuzel Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2011-11-24 Impact factor: 2.796