PURPOSE: Observational studies that collect patient-level survey data at the point-of-care are often called card studies. Card studies have been used to describe clinical problems, management, and outcomes in primary care for more than 30 years. In this article we describe 2 types of card studies and the methods for conducting them. METHODS: We undertook a descriptive review of card studies conducted in 3 Colorado practice-based research networks and several other networks throughout the United States. We summarized experiences of the State Networks of Colorado Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP). RESULTS: Card studies can be designed to study specific conditions or care (clinicians complete a card when they encounter patients who meet inclusion criteria) and to determine trends and prevalence of conditions (clinicians complete a card on all patients seen during a period). Data can be collected from clinicians and patients and can be linked. CONCLUSIONS: Card studies provide cross-sectional descriptive data about clinical care, knowledge and behavior, perception of care, and prevalence of conditions. Card studies remain a robust method for describing primary care.
PURPOSE: Observational studies that collect patient-level survey data at the point-of-care are often called card studies. Card studies have been used to describe clinical problems, management, and outcomes in primary care for more than 30 years. In this article we describe 2 types of card studies and the methods for conducting them. METHODS: We undertook a descriptive review of card studies conducted in 3 Colorado practice-based research networks and several other networks throughout the United States. We summarized experiences of the State Networks of Colorado Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP). RESULTS: Card studies can be designed to study specific conditions or care (clinicians complete a card when they encounter patients who meet inclusion criteria) and to determine trends and prevalence of conditions (clinicians complete a card on all patients seen during a period). Data can be collected from clinicians and patients and can be linked. CONCLUSIONS: Card studies provide cross-sectional descriptive data about clinical care, knowledge and behavior, perception of care, and prevalence of conditions. Card studies remain a robust method for describing primary care.
Authors: Daniel C Vinson; Brian K Manning; James M Galliher; L Miriam Dickinson; Wilson D Pace; Barbara J Turner Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Bennett L Parnes; Deborah S Main; L Miriam Dickinson; Linda Niebauer; Sherry Holcomb; John M Westfall; Wilson D Pace Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Ned Norman; Chris Bennett; Shirley Cowart; Maret Felzien; Martha Flores; Rafael Flores; Connie Haynes; Mike Hernandez; Mary Petra Rodriquez; Norah Sanchez; Sergio Sanchez; Kathy Winkelman; Steve Winkelman; Linda Zittleman; John M Westfall Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2013 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: John M Westfall; Linda Zittleman; Marc Ringel; Christin Sutter; Kelly McCaffrey; Susan Gale; Tony Gerk; Sergio Sanchez; William LeBlanc; L Miriam Dickinson; Perry Dickinson Journal: London J Prim Care (Abingdon) Date: 2014
Authors: John M Westfall; Beth Ingram; Daniel Navarro; Deidre Magee; Linda Niebauer; Linda Zittleman; Douglas Fernald; Wilson Pace Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 4.689
Authors: Amy M Bauer; Tessa Rue; Gina A Keppel; Allison M Cole; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Wayne Katon Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2014 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Amy M Bauer; Tessa Rue; Sean A Munson; Reza Hosseini Ghomi; Gina A Keppel; Allison M Cole; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Wayne Katon Journal: J Mob Technol Med Date: 2017-08
Authors: Michelle D Hamilton; Philip A Cola; Joshua J Terchek; James J Werner; Kurt C Stange Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2011 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Eric K Shaw; Jenna Howard; David R West; Benjamin F Crabtree; Donald E Nease; Brandon Tutt; Paul A Nutting Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2012 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.657