Robert L Williams1, Brian M Shelley, Andrew L Sussman. 1. Department of Family and Community Medicine, MSC 09 5040, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131-0001, USA. rlwilliams@salud.unm.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Interest in community-based participatory research (CBPR) has surged during the last several years because of its potential to enhance the quality and usefulness of research outcomes. Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) potentially can provide a bridge between the research endeavor and communities; PBRNs have been identified as a promising venue for CBPR. However, this marriage of CBPR and PBRNs faces many challenges, such as locus of project idea generation, time constraints, and funding limitations. METHODS: This was a case study of the application of the CBPR model and CBPR principles specific to PBRN research using a recent PBRN study of communication about traditional, complementary, and alternative medicines. RESULTS: Challenges (eg, added cost, time) and benefits (eg, improved research data collection process, enhanced data analysis) resulted from application of the CBPR model and are detailed. CONCLUSIONS: For practical and ethical reasons, PBRNs need to adopt the CBPR approach for certain types, if not all, of their research. This might require operational adaptations by the PBRN (eg, a community advisory board, community membership in the network board of directors, and outreach to community groups for input into network priorities) as well as dedicated time and funding.
BACKGROUND: Interest in community-based participatory research (CBPR) has surged during the last several years because of its potential to enhance the quality and usefulness of research outcomes. Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) potentially can provide a bridge between the research endeavor and communities; PBRNs have been identified as a promising venue for CBPR. However, this marriage of CBPR and PBRNs faces many challenges, such as locus of project idea generation, time constraints, and funding limitations. METHODS: This was a case study of the application of the CBPR model and CBPR principles specific to PBRN research using a recent PBRN study of communication about traditional, complementary, and alternative medicines. RESULTS: Challenges (eg, added cost, time) and benefits (eg, improved research data collection process, enhanced data analysis) resulted from application of the CBPR model and are detailed. CONCLUSIONS: For practical and ethical reasons, PBRNs need to adopt the CBPR approach for certain types, if not all, of their research. This might require operational adaptations by the PBRN (eg, a community advisory board, community membership in the network board of directors, and outreach to community groups for input into network priorities) as well as dedicated time and funding.
Authors: R P Strauss; S Sengupta; S C Quinn; J Goeppinger; C Spaulding; S M Kegeles; G Millett Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Andrew L Sussman; Robert L Williams; Robert Leverence; Park W Gloyd; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2006 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Brian M Shelley; Andrew L Sussman; Robert L Williams; Alissa R Segal; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2009 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Kimberly Campbell-Voytal; Jeanette M Daly; Zsolt J Nagykaldi; Cheryl B Aspy; Rowena J Dolor; Lyle J Fagnan; Barcey T Levy; Hannah L Palac; LeAnn Michaels; V Beth Patterson; Miria Kano; Paul D Smith; Andrew L Sussman; Robert Williams; Pamela Sterling; Maeve O'Beirne; Anne Victoria Neale Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2015-11-25 Impact factor: 4.689
Authors: Renée I Boothroyd; Aprille Y Flint; A Mark Lapiz; Sheryl Lyons; Karen Lofts Jarboe; William A Aldridge Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Arthur Kaufman; Paul B Roth; Richard S Larson; Nancy Ridenour; Lynda S Welage; Valerie Romero-Leggott; Carolina Nkouaga; Karen Armitage; Kara L McKinney Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Jennifer E Devoe; Rachel Gold; Mark Spofford; Susan Chauvie; John Muench; Ann Turner; Sonja Likumahuwa; Christine Nelson Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2011 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Robert L Williams; Cathleen E Willging; Gilbert Quintero; Summers Kalishman; Andrew L Sussman; William L Freeman Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Gregg H Gilbert; Joshua S Richman; Valeria V Gordan; D Brad Rindal; Jeffrey L Fellows; Paul L Benjamin; Martha Wallace-Dawson; O Dale Williams Journal: J Dent Educ Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 2.264
Authors: Christina M Getrich; Andrew L Sussman; Kimberly Campbell-Voytal; Janice Y Tsoh; Robert L Williams; Anthony E Brown; Michael B Potter; William Spears; Nancy Weller; John Pascoe; Kendra Schwartz; Anne Victoria Neale Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2013 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166