Literature DB >> 17340154

Bone strains around apically free versus grafted implants in the posterior maxilla of human cadavers.

Murat Cavit Cehreli1, Murat Akkocaoglu, Ayhan Comert, Ibrahim Tekdemir, Kivanc Akca.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the bone strains of apically free versus grafted implants in the posterior maxilla. The experiments were undertaken in four edentulous maxillary posterior regions of fresh human cadavers, having a minimum bone height of 8 mm. In each bone fragment, two Ø 4.1 mm x 12 mm Straumann implants were placed, and insertion torque values (ITV) and implant stability quotients (ISQ) of the implants were quantified to determine implant anchorage. Two splinted crowns were fabricated for each experimental model. Strain gauges were bonded on the buccal and sinus floor cortical bones around apically free and grafted implants. Microstrains were recorded by a data acquisition system and corresponding software at a sample rate of 10 KHz under central and buccally oriented lateral-axial static loads of 100 and 150 N in separate cases. The data were compared by independent T test at a significance level set at P<0.05. Bone tissue strains on the buccal cortical areas adjacent to apically free implants were higher than those of apically grafted implants (P<0.05). The differences ranged between 10 and 48 mu epsilon under central and lateral axial loads of 100 and 150 N. The shift in load application from central to buccally oriented lateral axial mode increased strains between 60 and 201 mu epsilon on buccal cortical bone around apically free and grafted implants (P<0.05). Bone strains around anterior implants were higher than those of posterior implants. Microstrains in the sinus floor cortical bone in apically grafted models were slightly higher than apically free models. Bone tissue strains on the buccal cortical areas adjacent to apicallyfree implants are higher than those of apically grafted implants. Sinus lifting, resulting in an enhanced apical support, slightly increases strains at the sinus floor region, but leads to a decrease in bone strains around the collar of supporting implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17340154     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-007-0173-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  29 in total

1.  A comparison of three-dimensional finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on dental implants.

Authors:  Kivanç Akça; Murat C Cehreli; Haldun Iplikçioglu
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.681

2.  Comparison of post-gel shrinkage strains in light-polymerized composite resins.

Authors:  Murat C Cehreli; Senay Canay
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant stability in the atrophic posterior maxilla: a mathematical study of the sinus floor augmentation.

Authors:  Gabor Tepper; Robert Haas; Werner Zechner; Wolfgang Krach; Georg Watzek
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Implant design and interface force transfer. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis.

Authors:  Murat Cehreli; Joke Duyck; Michel De Cooman; Robert Puers; Ignace Naert
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  Localized management of sinus floor with simultaneous implant placement: a clinical report.

Authors:  G B Bruschi; A Scipioni; G Calesini; E Bruschi
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique.

Authors:  R B Summers
Journal:  Compendium       Date:  1994-02

7.  A long-term follow-up study of non-submerged ITI implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Part I: Ten-year life table analysis of a prospective multicenter study with 1286 implants.

Authors:  Nicola Ferrigno; Mauro Laureti; Stefano Fanali; Guido Grippaudo
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.977

8.  Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor.

Authors:  Omer Lutfi Koca; Gurcan Eskitascioglu; Aslihan Usumez
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 9.  Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.

Authors:  Stephen S Wallace; Stuart J Froum
Journal:  Ann Periodontol       Date:  2003-12

10.  A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants.

Authors:  Naoki Hatano; Yoshinaka Shimizu; Kiyoshi Ooya
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.977

View more
  2 in total

1.  Influence of graft quality and marginal bone loss on implants placed in maxillary grafted sinus: a finite element study.

Authors:  Samroeng Inglam; Siriwan Suebnukarn; Wichit Tharanon; Tratat Apatananon; Kriskrai Sitthiseripratip
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Numerical assessment of bone remodeling around conventionally and early loaded titanium and titanium-zirconium alloy dental implants.

Authors:  Kıvanç Akça; Atılım Eser; Yeliz Çavuşoğlu; Elçin Sağırkaya; Murat Cavit Çehreli
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.602

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.