Literature DB >> 17339554

Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on survival after mitral valve replacement.

Julien Magne1, Patrick Mathieu, Jean G Dumesnil, David Tanné, François Dagenais, Daniel Doyle, Philippe Pibarot.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We recently reported that valve prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) is associated with persisting pulmonary hypertension after mitral valve replacement. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of PPM on mortality in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The indexed valve effective orifice area was estimated for each type and size of prosthesis being implanted in 929 consecutive patients and used to define PPM as not clinically significant if > 1.2 cm2/m2, as moderate if > 0.9 and < or = 1.2 cm2/m2, and as severe if < or = 0.9 cm2/m2. Moderate PPM was present in 69% of patients; severe PPM was seen in 9%. For patients with severe PPM, 6-year survival (74+/-5%) and 12-year survival (63+/-7%) were significantly less than for patients with moderate PPM (84+/-1% and 76+/-2%; P=0.027) or nonsignificant PPM (90+/-2% and 82+/-4%; P=0.002). On multivariate analysis, severe PPM was associated with higher mortality (hazard ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 6.8; P=0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Severe PPM is an independent predictor of mortality after mitral valve replacement. As opposed to other independent risk factors, PPM may be avoided or its severity may be reduced with the use of a prospective strategy at the time of operation. For patients identified as being at risk for severe PPM, every effort should be made to implant a prosthesis with a larger effective orifice area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17339554     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.631549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  28 in total

1.  Mitral valve area during exercise after restrictive mitral valve annuloplasty: importance of diastolic anterior leaflet tethering.

Authors:  Philippe B Bertrand; Frederik H Verbrugge; David Verhaert; Christophe J P Smeets; Lars Grieten; Wilfried Mullens; Herbert Gutermann; Robert A Dion; Robert A Levine; Pieter M Vandervoort
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch: an update.

Authors:  Jean G Dumesnil; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Sudden death due to nonarrhythmic cause in a patient with L-TGA.

Authors:  Robert M Hayward; Philip C Ursell; Elyse Foster; Zian H Tseng
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Factors affecting survival after mitral valve replacement in patients with prosthesis-patient mismatch.

Authors:  Abdulhameed Aziz; Jennifer S Lawton; Hersh S Maniar; Michael K Pasque; Ralph J Damiano; Marc R Moon
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Patient-prosthesis mismatch in the mitral position affects midterm survival and functional status.

Authors:  Denis Bouchard; Frédéric Vanden Eynden; Philippe Demers; Louis P Perrault; Michel Carrier; Raymond Cartier; Arsène J Basmadjian; Michel Pellerin
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.223

6.  Pulmonary hypertension in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  André Denault; Alain Deschamps; Jean-Claude Tardif; Jean Lambert; Louis Perrault
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2010-02

7.  Assessment of mitral bioprostheses using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; André Rudolph; Ralf Wassmuth; Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Immediate and mid-term result of restrictive mitral annuloplasty using a small semi-rigid ring.

Authors:  Masayoshi Umesue; Hironori Baba; Satoshi Kimura
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-02-16

9.  Computational investigation of left ventricular hemodynamics following bioprosthetic aortic and mitral valve replacement.

Authors:  Fei Xu; Emily L Johnson; Chenglong Wang; Arian Jafari; Cheng-Hau Yang; Michael S Sacks; Adarsh Krishnamurthy; Ming-Chen Hsu
Journal:  Mech Res Commun       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.254

10.  Weight gain potential-a neglected entity during valve replacement.

Authors:  Vijayanand Palanisamy; Karthik Raman; Anjith Prakash Rajakumar; Anbarasu Mohanraj; Jacob Jamesraj; Ejaz Ahmed Sheriff; Valikapthalil Mathew Kurian; Rajan Sethuratnam
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-07-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.