Literature DB >> 1733917

Analysis of possible interactions of an attentional task with cochlear micromechanics.

P Avan1, P Bonfils.   

Abstract

Several contradictory studies have been published regarding the effect of selective attention on cochlear mechanics, possibly modulated through efferent pathways. Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions have been proposed as a highly sensitive tool for testing the hypothesis of such a modulation. In this study, two other types of evoked otoacoustic emissions (i.e. distortion products and stimulus frequency emissions between 1 and 4 kHz) were measured on 20 normal subjects in absence and presence of a visual selective attention task. The duration of measurements at a given frequency was short enough to eliminate possible artefacts due to long-time averaging. No significant change was observed in these signals, considered as probes of cochlear micromechanics. It is concluded that in this set of experimental conditions, selective attention has a negligible effect on peripheral sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1733917     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(92)90156-h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  10 in total

1.  No effects of attention or visual perceptual load on cochlear function, as measured with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Examining replicability of an otoacoustic measure of cochlear function during selective attention.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Diffusion tensor imaging reveals white matter microstructure correlations with auditory processing ability.

Authors:  Vincent J Schmithorst; Scott K Holland; Elena Plante
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Selective attention reduces physiological noise in the external ear canals of humans. I: auditory attention.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Selective attention reduces physiological noise in the external ear canals of humans. II: visual attention.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Cognitive task demands modulate the sensitivity of the human cochlea.

Authors:  David W Smith; Rony K Aouad; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-02-13

7.  Heightened visual attention does not affect inner ear function as measured by otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  W Wiktor Jedrzejczak; Rafal Milner; Lukasz Olszewski; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Oscillatory infrasonic modulation of the cochlear amplifier by selective attention.

Authors:  Constantino D Dragicevic; Bruno Marcenaro; Marcela Navarrete; Luis Robles; Paul H Delano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effect of Auditory Predictability on the Human Peripheral Auditory System.

Authors:  Lars Riecke; Irina-Andreea Marianu; Federico De Martino
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Auditory Attention Reduced Ear-Canal Noise in Humans by Reducing Subject Motion, Not by Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Inhibition: Implications for Measuring Otoacoustic Emissions During a Behavioral Task.

Authors:  Nikolas A Francis; Wei Zhao; John J Guinan
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.