Literature DB >> 20081172

Syntactic transfer in artificial grammar learning.

T Beesley1, A J Wills, M E Le Pelley.   

Abstract

In an artificial grammar learning (AGL) experiment, participants were trained with instances of one grammatical structure before completing a test phase in which they were required to discriminate grammatical from randomly created strings. Importantly, the underlying structure used to generate test strings was different from that used to generate the training strings. Despite the fact that grammatical training strings were more similar to nongrammatical test strings than they were to grammatical test strings, this manipulation resulted in a positive transfer effect, as compared with controls trained with nongrammatical strings. It is suggested that training with grammatical strings leads to an appreciation of set variance that aids the detection of grammatical test strings in AGL tasks. The analysis presented demonstrates that it is useful to conceptualize test performance in AGL as a form of unsupervised category learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20081172     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.1.122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  13 in total

1.  The role of similarity in artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  E M Pothos; T M Bailey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Transfer in artificial grammar learning: the role of repetition information.

Authors:  Anja Lotz; Annette Kinder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Theories of artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Emmanuel M Pothos
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research.

Authors:  R F Lorch; J L Myers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Abstraction processes in artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  D R Shanks; T Johnstone; L Staggs
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1997-02

6.  Distributional expectations and the induction of category structure.

Authors:  M J Flannagan; L S Fried; K J Holyoak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1986-03

8.  A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  J M Pearce
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  The formation of structurally relevant units in artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Pierre Perruchet; Annie Vinter; Chantal Pacteau; Jorge Gallego
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2002-04

10.  Does maintenance of colour categories rely on language? Evidence to the contrary from a case of semantic dementia.

Authors:  Catherine Haslam; A J Wills; S Alexander Haslam; Janice Kay; Rachel Baron; Fiona McNab
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.381

View more
  1 in total

1.  Modeling test learning and dual-task dissociations.

Authors:  Tobias Johansson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.