Literature DB >> 17337005

Shape variation in protein binding pockets and their ligands.

Abdullah Kahraman1, Richard J Morris, Roman A Laskowski, Janet M Thornton.   

Abstract

A common assumption about the shape of protein binding pockets is that they are related to the shape of the small ligand molecules that can bind there. But to what extent is that assumption true? Here we use a recently developed shape matching method to compare the shapes of protein binding pockets to the shapes of their ligands. We find that pockets binding the same ligand show greater variation in their shapes than can be accounted for by the conformational variability of the ligand. This suggests that geometrical complementarity in general is not sufficient to drive molecular recognition. Nevertheless, we show when considering only shape and size that a significant proportion of the recognition power of a binding pocket for its ligand resides in its shape. Additionally, we observe a "buffer zone" or a region of free space between the ligand and protein, which results in binding pockets being on average three times larger than the ligand that they bind.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17337005     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.01.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  75 in total

1.  Real-time ligand binding pocket database search using local surface descriptors.

Authors:  Rayan Chikhi; Lee Sael; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-07

Review 2.  Flexibility and binding affinity in protein-ligand, protein-protein and multi-component protein interactions: limitations of current computational approaches.

Authors:  Pierre Tuffery; Philippe Derreumaux
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Self-complementarity within proteins: bridging the gap between binding and folding.

Authors:  Sankar Basu; Dhananjay Bhattacharyya; Rahul Banerjee
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Prediction of ligand-binding sites of proteins by molecular docking calculation for a random ligand library.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Fukunishi; Haruki Nakamura
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  The Recognition of Identical Ligands by Unrelated Proteins.

Authors:  Sarah Barelier; Teague Sterling; Matthew J O'Meara; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 5.100

6.  PatchSearch: a web server for off-target protein identification.

Authors:  Julien Rey; Inès Rasolohery; Pierre Tufféry; Frédéric Guyon; Gautier Moroy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Detecting local ligand-binding site similarity in nonhomologous proteins by surface patch comparison.

Authors:  Lee Sael; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2012-01-24

8.  Comparative insights using the molecular homology model of BDNF (Brain derived neurotrophic factor) of Varanus komodoensis and the known NGF (Nerve growth factor) structure of Naja atra.

Authors:  Ankit Verma; Dhirendra Kumar Sharma; Rituparna Sarma; Hasnahana Chetia; Juri Saikia
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2013-08-28

9.  SHEF: a vHTS geometrical filter using coefficients of spherical harmonic molecular surfaces.

Authors:  Wensheng Cai; Jiawei Xu; Xueguang Shao; Vincent Leroux; Alexandre Beautrait; Bernard Maigret
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 1.810

10.  On the role of physics and evolution in dictating protein structure and function.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Mu Gao; Hongyi Zhou
Journal:  Isr J Chem       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.