Literature DB >> 20455259

Real-time ligand binding pocket database search using local surface descriptors.

Rayan Chikhi1, Lee Sael, Daisuke Kihara.   

Abstract

Because of the increasing number of structures of unknown function accumulated by ongoing structural genomics projects, there is an urgent need for computational methods for characterizing protein tertiary structures. As functions of <span class="Species">many of these proteins are not easily predicted by conventional sequence database searches, a legitimate strategy is to utilize structure information in function characterization. Of particular interest is prediction of ligand binding to a protein, as ligand molecule recognition is a major part of molecular function of proteins. Predicting whether a ligand molecule binds a protein is a complex problem due to the physical nature of protein-ligand interactions and the flexibility of both binding sites and ligand molecules. However, geometric and physicochemical complementarity is observed between the ligand and its binding site in <span class="Species">many cases. Therefore, ligand molecules which bind to a local surface site in a protein can be predicted by finding similar local pockets of known binding ligands in the structure database. Here, we present two representations of ligand binding pockets and utilize them for ligand binding prediction by pocket shape comparison. These representations are based on mapping of surface properties of binding pockets, which are compactly described either by the two-dimensional pseudo-Zernike moments or the three-dimensional Zernike descriptors. These compact representations allow a fast real-time pocket searching against a database. Thorough benchmark studies employing two different datasets show that our representations are competitive with the other existing methods. Limitations and potentials of the shape-based methods as well as possible improvements are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20455259      PMCID: PMC3009464          DOI: 10.1002/prot.22715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  73 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Microbial genomes have over 72% structure assignment by the threading algorithm PROSPECTOR_Q.

Authors:  Daisuke Kihara; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-05-01

3.  Inference of protein function from protein structure.

Authors:  Debnath Pal; David Eisenberg
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  A threading-based method (FINDSITE) for ligand-binding site prediction and functional annotation.

Authors:  Michal Brylinski; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  3D-SURFER: software for high-throughput protein surface comparison and analysis.

Authors:  David La; Juan Esquivel-Rodríguez; Vishwesh Venkatraman; Bin Li; Lee Sael; Stephen Ueng; Steven Ahrendt; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design.

Authors:  J Liang; H Edelsbrunner; C Woodward
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function.

Authors:  R A Laskowski; N M Luscombe; M B Swindells; J M Thornton
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Improved tools for biological sequence comparison.

Authors:  W R Pearson; D J Lipman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The CATH classification revisited--architectures reviewed and new ways to characterize structural divergence in superfamilies.

Authors:  Alison L Cuff; Ian Sillitoe; Tony Lewis; Oliver C Redfern; Richard Garratt; Janet Thornton; Christine A Orengo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Detection of pockets on protein surfaces using small and large probe spheres to find putative ligand binding sites.

Authors:  Takeshi Kawabata; Nobuhiro Go
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007-08-01
View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Computational characterization of moonlighting proteins.

Authors:  Ishita K Khan; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.407

2.  Structure- and sequence-based function prediction for non-homologous proteins.

Authors:  Lee Sael; Meghana Chitale; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2012-01-22

3.  Detecting local ligand-binding site similarity in nonhomologous proteins by surface patch comparison.

Authors:  Lee Sael; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2012-01-24

Review 4.  Computational methods in drug discovery.

Authors:  Gregory Sliwoski; Sandeepkumar Kothiwale; Jens Meiler; Edward W Lowe
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 25.468

5.  Ligand binding site similarity identification based on chemical and geometric similarity.

Authors:  Haibo Tu; Tieliu Shi
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.371

6.  Discovery of Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Binding Proteins in the Escherichia coli Proteome Using a Combined Energetic- and Structural-Bioinformatics-Based Approach.

Authors:  Lingfei Zeng; Woong-Hee Shin; Xiaolei Zhu; Sung Hoon Park; Chiwook Park; W Andy Tao; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Large-scale binding ligand prediction by improved patch-based method Patch-Surfer2.0.

Authors:  Xiaolei Zhu; Yi Xiong; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  APoc: large-scale identification of similar protein pockets.

Authors:  Mu Gao; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  The PFP and ESG protein function prediction methods in 2014: effect of database updates and ensemble approaches.

Authors:  Ishita K Khan; Qing Wei; Samuel Chapman; Dukka B Kc; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 6.524

10.  On the role of physics and evolution in dictating protein structure and function.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Mu Gao; Hongyi Zhou
Journal:  Isr J Chem       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.