Literature DB >> 17334792

Is anterior release necessary in severe scoliosis treated by posterior segmental pedicle screw fixation?

Se-Il Suk1, Jin-Hyok Kim, Kyu-Jung Cho, Sung-Soo Kim, Jeong-Joon Lee, Yong-Taek Han.   

Abstract

With the advent of segmental pedicle screw fixation that enables more powerful corrective forces, it is postulated that an additional anterior procedure may be unnecessary even in severe deformities. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the results of a posterior procedure alone using segmental pedicle screw fixation in severe scoliotic curves over 70 degrees . Thirty-five scoliosis patients treated by pedicle screw fixation and rod derotation were retrospectively analyzed after a minimum follow-up of 2 years (range 2-10.4). The mean age of patients was 15.3 years (range 9.8-34.2). Diagnoses were idiopathic scoliosis in 29, neuromuscular scoliosis in 3 and scoliosis associated with Marfan syndrome in 3. Scoliosis consisted of single thoracic curve in 18, double thoracic in 5 and double major in 12. Twenty-five patients showed a major thoracic curve greater than 70 degrees (range 70-100), and different ten patients showed a major lumbar curve greater than 70 degrees (range 70-105), pre-operatively. The deformity angle, lowest instrumented vertebral tilt (LIVT) and spinal balance were measured. Pre-operatively there were nine patients with coronal decompensation. The pre-operative thoracic curve of 80 +/- 9 degrees with the flexibility of 45 +/- 11% (45 +/- 11 degrees in side-bending film) was corrected to 27 +/- 10 degrees at the most recent follow-up, showing a correction of 66% (53 degrees) and loss of correction of 3.0% (3.7 degrees). The pre-operative lumbar curve of 79 +/- 12 degrees with the flexibility of 62 +/- 14% (30 +/- 11 degrees in side-bending film) was corrected to 33 +/- 14 degrees at the most recent follow-up [59% (46 degrees) curve correction, 3.5% (3.0 degrees) loss of curve correction]. The pre-operative LIVT of 30 +/- 8 degrees was corrected to 11 +/- 6 degrees, showing a correction of 62% (19 degrees). Residual coronal decompensation was observed in three patients postoperatively. Pre-operative thoracic kyphosis of 27 degrees (range 0-82) improved postoperatively to 31 degrees (range 14-53). In conclusion, posterior segmental pedicle screw fixation without anterior release in severe scoliosis had satisfactory deformity correction without significant loss of curve correction. In this series a posterior procedure alone obviated the need for the anterior release and avoided complications related anterior surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17334792      PMCID: PMC2200756          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0334-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  17 in total

Review 1.  Surgical treatment of idiopathic adolescent scoliosis.

Authors:  K H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Comparative analysis of pedicle screw and hook instrumentation in posterior correction and fusion of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis.

Authors:  U Liljenqvist; U Lepsien; L Hackenberg; T Niemeyer; H Halm
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Restoration of thoracic kyphosis in the hypokyphotic spine: a comparison between multiple-hook and segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  S I Suk; W J Kim; J H Kim; S M Lee
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1999-12

4.  The success of thoracoscopic anterior fusion in a consecutive series of 112 pediatric spinal deformity cases.

Authors:  Peter O Newton; Klane K White; Frances Faro; Tracey Gaynor
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for the treatment of severe scoliosis.

Authors:  G De Giorgi; G Stella; S Becchetti; G Martucci; D Miscioscia
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  L G Lenke; R R Betz; J Harms; K H Bridwell; D H Clements; T G Lowe; K Blanke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Anterior thoracoscopic surgery followed by posterior instrumentation and fusion in spinal deformity.

Authors:  T Niemeyer; B J Freeman; M P Grevitt; J K Webb
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Intraoperative comparison of two instrumentation techniques for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Rod rotation and translation.

Authors:  S Delorme; H Labelle; C E Aubin; J A de Guise; C H Rivard; B Poitras; C Coillard; J Dansereau
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Anterior endoscopic discectomy and fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Yongjung J Kim; Lawrence G Lenke; Samuel K Cho; Keith H Bridwell; Brenda Sides; Kathy Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2007.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Posterior operative correction of idiopathic scoliosis. Value of pedicle screws versus hooks].

Authors:  V Bullmann; U R Liljenqvist; C Schmidt; T L Schulte
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Comparative analysis between shape memory alloy-based correction and traditional correction technique in pedicle screws constructs for treating severe scoliosis.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Guoquan Zheng; Xuesong Zhang; Yonggang Zhang; Songhua Xiao; Zheng Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Predictive factors for correction rate in severe idiopathic scoliosis (Cobb angle ≥ 90°): an analysis of 128 patients.

Authors:  Yuki Mihara; Weng Hong Chung; Siti Mariam Mohamad; Chee Kidd Chiu; Chris Yin Wei Chan; Mun Keong Kwan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Long-term experience with simultaneous prone video-assisted thoracoscopic anterior spinal release and posterior spinal fusion in severe rigid pediatric spinal deformities.

Authors:  Chirag A Berry; Viral V Jain; Kedar P Padhye; Alvin H Crawford
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Maintenance of Derotation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: a Novel Technique Measuring Postoperative Vertebral Rotation by Pedicle Screw Position.

Authors:  Benjamin T Bjerke; Zoe B Cheung; Grant D Shifflett; Sravisht Iyer; Peter D Fabricant; Han Jo Kim
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-10-19

7.  Increased rod stiffness improves the degree of deformity correction by segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Kasim Abul-Kasim; Magnus K Karlsson; Acke Ohlin
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2011-07-28

8.  Factors associated with surgical approach and outcomes in cerebral palsy scoliosis.

Authors:  Taylor Jackson; Burt Yaszay; Paul D Sponseller; Peter O Newton; Suken A Shah; Firoz Miyanji; Patrick J Cahill
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Surgical treatment of scoliosis in Marfan syndrome: outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Jun Qiao; Leilei Xu; Zhen Liu; Feng Zhu; Bangping Qian; Xu Sun; Zezhang Zhu; Yong Qiu; Qing Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Treatment of severe scoliosis with posterior-only approach arthrodesis and all-pedicle screw instrumentation.

Authors:  Marco Crostelli; Osvaldo Mazza; Massimo Mariani; Dario Mascello
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.