Literature DB >> 30143896

Factors associated with surgical approach and outcomes in cerebral palsy scoliosis.

Taylor Jackson1, Burt Yaszay2, Paul D Sponseller3, Peter O Newton4, Suken A Shah5, Firoz Miyanji6, Patrick J Cahill7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular scoliosis is often treated with posterior spinal fusion, with or without anterior release, and either a same-day or staged, 2-day procedure.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 222 patients from a prospectively collected, multi-center database of patients with cerebral palsy scoliosis with 2-year follow-up. Baseline characteristics, perioperative, radiographic, and HRQoL measures were compared in six sub-analyses: (1) staged versus same-day surgeries, (2) posterior-only fusion (PSF) versus anterior-posterior spinal fusion (APSF), (3) same-day versus staged PSF, (4) staged versus same-day APSF, (5) same-day PSF versus same-day APSF, (6) staged PSF versus staged APSF.
RESULTS: Staged patients had larger curves and more pelvic obliquity, longer anesthesia and surgical times, longer hospital and ICU stays (p < 0.001), and more days intubated (p = 0.021). The staged PSF group had larger curves (p = 0.006), longer anesthesia (p = 0.020) and surgeries (p = 0.007), hospital (p = 0.009) and ICU stays (p = 0.028) compared to same-day PSF. The staged APSF group had longer hospital (p < 0.001) and ICU stays (p = 0.004) and anesthesia and surgeries (p < 0.001). Same-day APSF was associated with larger curves (p < 0.002), longer anesthesia (p = 0.012) and surgeries (p = 0.042), greater residual curves (p = 0.035), and greater absolute correction (p = 0.007) compared to same-day PSF. The staged APSF group had longer anesthesia times (p < 0.001) compared to the staged PSF group. No sub-analysis revealed significant differences in baseline characteristics, complications, or HRQoL.
CONCLUSION: Staged and circumferential approaches tend to be used for greater deformity, but were not associated with superior deformity correction, and were associated with longer operative time, hospital stays, ICU stays, and days intubated. However, for the most severe deformity, other patient factors may play more important roles in treatment decisions given that patients treated with a staged PSF or an APSF, whether staged or not, were similar at baseline. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior spinal fusion; Cerebral palsy; Neuromuscular scoliosis; Posterior spinal fusion; Staged fusion

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30143896     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5745-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  24 in total

1.  Spinal fusion for spastic neuromuscular scoliosis: is anterior releasing necessary when intraoperative halo-femoral traction is used?

Authors:  Kathryn A Keeler; Lawrence G Lenke; Christopher R Good; Keith H Bridwell; Brenda Sides; Scott J Luhmann
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Analysis of patients with nonambulatory neuromuscular scoliosis surgically treated to the pelvis with intraoperative halo-femoral traction.

Authors:  Katsushi Takeshita; Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell; Yongjung J Kim; Brenda Sides; Marsha Hensley
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Posterior-only surgery with strong halo-femoral traction for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliotic curves more than 100°.

Authors:  Hong-qi Zhang; Yu-xiang Wang; Chao-feng Guo; Ming-xing Tang; Ling-qiang Chen; Shao-hua Liu; Yong-fu Wang; Jing Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves between 70 degrees and 100 degrees: is anterior release necessary?

Authors:  Scott J Luhmann; Lawrence G Lenke; Yongjung J Kim; Keith H Bridwell; Mario Schootman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Temporary internal distraction as an aid to correction of severe scoliosis.

Authors:  Jacob M Buchowski; Rishi Bhatnagar; David L Skaggs; Paul D Sponseller
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Is there a role for selective anterior instrumentation in neuromuscular scoliosis?

Authors:  Devi Prakash Tokala; Khai S Lam; Brian J C Freeman; John K Webb
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Is anterior release necessary in severe scoliosis treated by posterior segmental pedicle screw fixation?

Authors:  Se-Il Suk; Jin-Hyok Kim; Kyu-Jung Cho; Sung-Soo Kim; Jeong-Joon Lee; Yong-Taek Han
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-03-03       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Surgical correction and fusion using posterior-only pedicle screw construct for neuropathic scoliosis in patients with cerebral palsy: a three-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Hitesh N Modi; Jae-Young Hong; Satyen S Mehta; S Srinivasalu; Seung-Woo Suh; Ju-Won Yi; Jae-Hyuk Yang; Hae-Ryong Song
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Comparison of one-stage versus two-stage anterior/posterior spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis.

Authors:  T O'Brien; J Akmakjian; G Ogin; R Eilert
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.324

10.  Comparison of one-stage versus two-stage anteroposterior spinal fusion in pediatric patients with cerebral palsy and neuromuscular scoliosis.

Authors:  Athanasios I Tsirikos; Wei-Ning Chang; K W Dabney; Freeman Miller
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Technical aspects of surgical correction of spinal deformities in cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Jorge Mineiro; Muharrem Yazici
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.