Margot Buyle1, Viktoria Azoidou2, Marousa Pavlou2, Vincent Van Rompaey1,3, Doris-Eva Bamiou4,5. 1. Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. 2. Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Centre for Human & Applied Physiological Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. 3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium. 4. Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London (UCL) Ear Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom. 5. Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Background: The ageing process may degrade an individual's balance control, hearing capacity, and cognitive function. Older adults perform worse on simultaneously executed balance and secondary tasks (i.e., dual-task performance) than younger adults and may be more vulnerable to auditory distraction. Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of passive listening on functional gait in healthy older vs. younger adults, and to investigate the effect of age, functional gait, hearing ability and cognitive functioning on dual-task performance. Methods: Twenty young and 20 older healthy adults were recruited. Functional gait (Functional Gait Assessment in silent and noisy condition), hearing function (audiogram; Speech in Babble test), and cognitive ability (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery) were measured. Results: Overall, a significant difference between functional gait performance in silent vs. noisy conditions was found (p = 0.022), with no significant difference in dual-task cost between the two groups (p = 0.11). Correlations were found between increasing age, worse functional gait performance, poorer hearing capacity and lower performance on cognitive function tasks. Interestingly, worse performance on attention tasks appeared to be associated with a worse functional gait performance in the noisy condition. Conclusion: Passive listening to multi-talker babble noise can affect functional gait in both young and older adults. This effect could result from the cognitive load of the babble noise, due to the engagement of attention networks by the unattended speech.
Background: The ageing process may degrade an individual's balance control, hearing capacity, and cognitive function. Older adults perform worse on simultaneously executed balance and secondary tasks (i.e., dual-task performance) than younger adults and may be more vulnerable to auditory distraction. Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of passive listening on functional gait in healthy older vs. younger adults, and to investigate the effect of age, functional gait, hearing ability and cognitive functioning on dual-task performance. Methods: Twenty young and 20 older healthy adults were recruited. Functional gait (Functional Gait Assessment in silent and noisy condition), hearing function (audiogram; Speech in Babble test), and cognitive ability (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery) were measured. Results: Overall, a significant difference between functional gait performance in silent vs. noisy conditions was found (p = 0.022), with no significant difference in dual-task cost between the two groups (p = 0.11). Correlations were found between increasing age, worse functional gait performance, poorer hearing capacity and lower performance on cognitive function tasks. Interestingly, worse performance on attention tasks appeared to be associated with a worse functional gait performance in the noisy condition. Conclusion: Passive listening to multi-talker babble noise can affect functional gait in both young and older adults. This effect could result from the cognitive load of the babble noise, due to the engagement of attention networks by the unattended speech.
Authors: Victoria Nieborowska; Sin-Tung Lau; Jennifer Campos; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Alison Novak; Karen Z H Li Journal: J Mot Behav Date: 2018-09-21 Impact factor: 1.328
Authors: Frank R Lin; Kristine Yaffe; Jin Xia; Qian-Li Xue; Tamara B Harris; Elizabeth Purchase-Helzner; Suzanne Satterfield; Hilsa N Ayonayon; Luigi Ferrucci; Eleanor M Simonsick Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-02-25 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Emilie Cardon; Laure Jacquemin; Griet Mertens; Paul Van de Heyning; Olivier M Vanderveken; Vedat Topsakal; Willem De Hertogh; Sarah Michiels; Vincent Van Rompaey; Annick Gilles Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: N V O Bento-Torres; J Bento-Torres; A M Tomás; V O Costa; P G R Corrêa; C N M Costa; N Y V Jardim; C W Picanço-Diniz Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 2.590