Literature DB >> 17333539

The region homologous to the X-chromosome inactivation centre has been disrupted in marsupial and monotreme mammals.

Timothy A Hore1, Edda Koina, Matthew J Wakefield, Jennifer A Marshall Graves.   

Abstract

Marsupial, as well as eutherian, mammals are subject to X chromosome inactivation in the somatic cells of females, although the phenotype and the molecular mechanism differ in important respects. Monotreme mammals appear to subscribe at least to a form of dosage compensation of X-borne genes. An important question is whether inactivation in these non-eutherian mammals involves co-ordination by a control locus homologous to the XIST gene and neighbouring genes, which play a key regulatory role in human and mouse X inactivation. We mapped BACs containing several orthologues of protein-coding genes that flank human and mouse XIST and genes that lie in the homologous region in chicken and frog. We found that these genes map to two distant locations on the opossum X, and also to different locations on a platypus autosome. We failed to find any trace of an XIST orthologue in any marsupial or monotreme or on any flanking BAC, confirming the conclusion from recent work that non-eutherian mammals lack XIST. We propose the region homologous to the human and mouse X-inactivation centre expanded in early mammals, and this unstable region was disrupted independently in marsupial and monotreme lineages. In the eutherian lineage, inserted and existing sequences provided the starting material for the non-translated RNAs of the X-inactivation centre, including XIST.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17333539     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-007-1119-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  58 in total

1.  Chromosomal silencing and localization are mediated by different domains of Xist RNA.

Authors:  Anton Wutz; Theodore P Rasmussen; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Is Tsix repression of Xist specific to mouse?

Authors:  Barbara R Migeon
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Histone underacetylation is an ancient component of mammalian X chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  M J Wakefield; A M Keohane; B M Turner; J A Graves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A physical map of the human genome.

Authors:  J D McPherson; M Marra; L Hillier; R H Waterston; A Chinwalla; J Wallis; M Sekhon; K Wylie; E R Mardis; R K Wilson; R Fulton; T A Kucaba; C Wagner-McPherson; W B Barbazuk; S G Gregory; S J Humphray; L French; R S Evans; G Bethel; A Whittaker; J L Holden; O T McCann; A Dunham; C Soderlund; C E Scott; D R Bentley; G Schuler; H C Chen; W Jang; E D Green; J R Idol; V V Maduro; K T Montgomery; E Lee; A Miller; S Emerling; R Gibbs; S Scherer; J H Gorrell; E Sodergren; K Clerc-Blankenburg; P Tabor; S Naylor; D Garcia; P J de Jong; J J Catanese; N Nowak; K Osoegawa; S Qin; L Rowen; A Madan; M Dors; L Hood; B Trask; C Friedman; H Massa; V G Cheung; I R Kirsch; T Reid; R Yonescu; J Weissenbach; T Bruls; R Heilig; E Branscomb; A Olsen; N Doggett; J F Cheng; T Hawkins; R M Myers; J Shang; L Ramirez; J Schmutz; O Velasquez; K Dixon; N E Stone; D R Cox; D Haussler; W J Kent; T Furey; S Rogic; S Kennedy; S Jones; A Rosenthal; G Wen; M Schilhabel; G Gloeckner; G Nyakatura; R Siebert; B Schlegelberger; J Korenberg; X N Chen; A Fujiyama; M Hattori; A Toyoda; T Yada; H S Park; Y Sakaki; N Shimizu; S Asakawa; K Kawasaki; T Sasaki; A Shintani; A Shimizu; K Shibuya; J Kudoh; S Minoshima; J Ramser; P Seranski; C Hoff; A Poustka; R Reinhardt; H Lehrach
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Phosphoglycerate kinase polymorphism in kangaroos provides further evidence for paternal X inactivation.

Authors:  D W Cooper; J L VandeBerg; G B Sharman; W E Poole
Journal:  Nat New Biol       Date:  1971-03-31

6.  X-inactivation profile reveals extensive variability in X-linked gene expression in females.

Authors:  Laura Carrel; Huntington F Willard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Phylogenetic analysis of 18S rRNA and the mitochondrial genomes of the wombat, Vombatus ursinus, and the spiny anteater, Tachyglossus aculeatus: increased support for the Marsupionta hypothesis.

Authors:  Axel Janke; Ola Magnell; Georg Wieczorek; Michael Westerman; Ulfur Arnason
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  DNA methylation stabilizes X chromosome inactivation in eutherians but not in marsupials: evidence for multistep maintenance of mammalian X dosage compensation.

Authors:  D C Kaslow; B R Migeon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Evolutionary conservation of possible functional domains of the human and murine XIST genes.

Authors:  B D Hendrich; C J Brown; H F Willard
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  Mammalian X chromosome inactivation: testing the hypothesis of transcriptional control.

Authors:  J A Graves; S M Gartler
Journal:  Somat Cell Mol Genet       Date:  1986-05
View more
  41 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of the primate X-inactivation center region and reconstruction of the ancestral primate XIST locus.

Authors:  Julie E Horvath; Christina B Sheedy; Stephanie L Merrett; Abdoulaye Banire Diallo; David L Swofford; Eric D Green; Huntington F Willard
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 2.  The sex-specific region of sex chromosomes in animals and plants.

Authors:  Andrea R Gschwend; Laura A Weingartner; Richard C Moore; Ray Ming
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 3.  The X as model for RNA's niche in epigenomic regulation.

Authors:  Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Two-step imprinted X inactivation: repeat versus genic silencing in the mouse.

Authors:  Satoshi H Namekawa; Bernhard Payer; Khanh D Huynh; Rudolf Jaenisch; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 5.  Weird mammals provide insights into the evolution of mammalian sex chromosomes and dosage compensation.

Authors:  Jennifer A Marshall Graves
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 6.  Evolution of vertebrate sex chromosomes and dosage compensation.

Authors:  Jennifer A Marshall Graves
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Sex chromosome silencing in the marsupial male germ line.

Authors:  Satoshi H Namekawa; John L VandeBerg; John R McCarrey; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Specific patterns of histone marks accompany X chromosome inactivation in a marsupial.

Authors:  Edda Koina; Julie Chaumeil; Ian K Greaves; David J Tremethick; Jennifer A Marshall Graves
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 9.  New twists in X-chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  Jennifer A Erwin; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2008-05-26       Impact factor: 8.382

10.  Physical map of two tammar wallaby chromosomes: a strategy for mapping in non-model mammals.

Authors:  Janine E Deakin; Edda Koina; Paul D Waters; Ruth Doherty; Vidushi S Patel; Margaret L Delbridge; Bianca Dobson; James Fong; Yanqiu Hu; Cecilia van den Hurk; Andrew J Pask; Geoff Shaw; Carly Smith; Katherine Thompson; Matthew J Wakefield; Hongshi Yu; Marilyn B Renfree; Jennifer A Marshall Graves
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.