Literature DB >> 17330529

Effect of required response force on rats' performance on a VI+ schedule of reinforcement.

Phil Reed1.   

Abstract

Three experiments were performed to examine the effect of response force on rats' performance on various schedules of reinforcement. Response force was manipulated by changing the weight of the lever in the operant chamber--a heavy lever for high response force and a light lever for low response force. Using a within-subjects design, Experiment 1 replicated previous findings that rats respond more quickly on variable ratio (VR) than on equivalent variable-interval-plus-linear-feedback (VI+) schedules. Experiment 2 replicated this finding but also showed that the use of a smaller response force abolished the response rate difference between the VR and VI+ schedules. Experiment 3 used a between-subjects design and showed a response rate difference between the VR and VI+ schedules with a high response force but no response rate difference with a low response force. This suggests that under conditions of low force, when the rats' responding can continue at prolonged high rates, these subjects show little difference in their response rates between VR and VI + schedules. These data are similar to those found for human subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17330529     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  7 in total

1.  The effect of signaled reinforcement on rats' fixed-interval responding.

Authors:  Phil Reed
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Multiple determinants of the effects of reinforcement magnitude on free-operant response rates.

Authors:  P Reed
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Response Form, Force, And Number: Effects On Concurrent-schedule Performance.

Authors:  C Sumpter; W Temple; T Foster
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Molar And Molecular Control In Variable-interval And Variable-ratio Schedules.

Authors:  M Cole
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Variable-ratio schedules as variable-interval schedules with linear feedback loops.

Authors:  J J McDowell; J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Human sensitivity to reinforcement feedback functions.

Authors:  Phil Reed
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

7.  Rats' performance on variable-interval schedules with a linear feedback loop between response rate and reinforcement rate.

Authors:  Phil Reed; Tom Hildebrandt; Julie DeJongh; Mariane Soh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  The copyist model of response emission.

Authors:  Takayuki Tanno; Alan Silberberg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

2.  Concurrent VR VI schedules: primacy of molar control of preference and molecular control of response rates.

Authors:  Takayuki Tanno; Alan Silberberg; Takayuki Sakagami
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  On the primacy of molecular processes in determining response rates under variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  Takayuki Tanno; Takayuki Sakagami
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Procedure for preventing response strain on random interval schedules with a linear feedback loop.

Authors:  Phil Reed
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.986

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.