Literature DB >> 12822684

Rats' performance on variable-interval schedules with a linear feedback loop between response rate and reinforcement rate.

Phil Reed1, Tom Hildebrandt, Julie DeJongh, Mariane Soh.   

Abstract

Three experiments investigated whether rats are sensitive to the molar properties of a variable-interval (VI) schedule with a positive relation between response rate and reinforcement rate (i.e., a VI+ schedule). In Experiment 1, rats responded faster on a variable ratio (VR) schedule than on a VI+ schedule with an equivalent feedback function. Reinforced interresponse times (IRTs) were shorter on the VR as compared to the VI+ schedule. In Experiments 2 and 3, there was no systematic difference in response rates maintained by a VI+ schedule and a VI schedule yoked in terms of reinforcement rate. This was found both when the yoking procedure was between-subject (Experiment 2) and within-subject (Experiment 3). Mean reinforced IRTs were similar on both the VI+ and yoked VI schedules, but these values were more variable on the VI+ schedule. These results provided no evidence that rats are sensitive to the feedback function relating response rate to reinforcement rate on a VI+ schedule.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12822684      PMCID: PMC1284927          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2003.79-157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  13 in total

Review 1.  SYSTEMATIC EFFECT OF RANDOM ERROR IN THE YOKED CONTROL DESIGN.

Authors:  R M CHURCH
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1964-08       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Dynamical concurrent schedules.

Authors:  William L Palya; Robert W Allan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Multiple determinants of the effects of reinforcement magnitude on free-operant response rates.

Authors:  P Reed
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Uninstructed human responding: sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies.

Authors:  B A Matthews; E Shimoff; A C Catania; T Sagvolden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Molar And Molecular Control In Variable-interval And Variable-ratio Schedules.

Authors:  M Cole
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The correlation-based law of effect.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Variable-ratio schedules as variable-interval schedules with linear feedback loops.

Authors:  J J McDowell; J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Influence of the cost of responding on human causality judgments.

Authors:  P Reed
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-03

9.  Optimization versus response-strength accounts of behavior.

Authors:  W Vaughan; H L Miller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Free-operant performance on variable interval schedules with a linear feedback loop: no evidence for molar sensitivities in rats.

Authors:  P Reed; M Soh; T Hildebrandt; J DeJongh; W Y Shek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2000-10
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The copyist model of response emission.

Authors:  Takayuki Tanno; Alan Silberberg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

2.  Concurrent VR VI schedules: primacy of molar control of preference and molecular control of response rates.

Authors:  Takayuki Tanno; Alan Silberberg; Takayuki Sakagami
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Feedback functions, optimization, and the relation of response rate to reinforcer rate.

Authors:  Paul L Soto; Jack J McDowell; Jesse Dallery
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Effect of required response force on rats' performance on a VI+ schedule of reinforcement.

Authors:  Phil Reed
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  On the primacy of molecular processes in determining response rates under variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  Takayuki Tanno; Takayuki Sakagami
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Procedure for preventing response strain on random interval schedules with a linear feedback loop.

Authors:  Phil Reed
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Human sensitivity to reinforcement feedback functions.

Authors:  Phil Reed
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.