Literature DB >> 1732932

Standardized mammography reporting.

D B Kopans1.   

Abstract

The use of mammographic screening to detect breast cancer at a preclinical stage is increasing rapidly in the United States. High-quality imaging and accurate interpretation are critical elements for successful mortality reduction. The communication of the interpretation is being scrutinized in an effort to eliminate ambiguity and confusion. This can be accomplished by an organized approach to interpretation and a structured analysis of significant findings. These can be grouped into five major categories ranging from a negative examination to findings suggesting a very high probability of malignancy. A concisely organized reporting system is to be proposed by committees of the ACR that will provide clinically relevant information. The system will suggest the use of an approved vocabulary and urge that significant findings be described concisely in a standardized format. All studies should be categorized using the five clinically useful assessment groups. This combined with the maintenance of a data base for determining results will improve the accuracy of the screening effort, permit the monitoring of the screening results, and provide feedback for improving the program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1732932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0033-8389            Impact factor:   2.303


  13 in total

1.  Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting.

Authors:  Lawrence H Schwartz; David M Panicek; Alexandra R Berk; Yuelin Li; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Impact of lesion segmentation metrics on computer-aided diagnosis/detection in breast computed tomography.

Authors:  Hsien-Chi Kuo; Maryellen L Giger; Ingrid Reiser; Karen Drukker; John M Boone; Karen K Lindfors; Kai Yang; Alexandra Edwards
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-12-24

3.  Problem-centric organization and visualization of patient imaging and clinical data.

Authors:  Vijayaraghavan Bashyam; William Hsu; Emily Watt; Alex A T Bui; Hooshang Kangarloo; Ricky K Taira
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Expressiveness of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System (BI-RADS).

Authors:  J Starren; S M Johnson
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997

5.  Voice-activated retrieval of mammography reference images.

Authors:  H A Swett; P G Mutalik; V P Neklesa; L Horvath; C Lee; J Richter; I Tocino; P R Fisher
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  [Structured reporting in radiology].

Authors:  T Hackländer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 7.  [Reporting initiatives. An update on treatment in radiology].

Authors:  J-M Hempel; D Pinto dos Santos; R Kloeckner; C Dueber; P Mildenberger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS) in the diagnostic value of thyroid nodules: a systematic review.

Authors:  Xi Wei; Ying Li; Sheng Zhang; Ming Gao
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-04-11

9.  Opinion: a prototype for a computerized national mammography registry and tracking system using telecommunications and the Internet.

Authors:  M S Frank
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Regional admittivity spectra with tomosynthesis images for breast cancer detection: preliminary patient study.

Authors:  Tzu-Jen Kao; Gregory Boverman; Bong Seok Kim; David Isaacson; Gary J Saulnier; Jonathan C Newell; Myoung H Choi; Richard H Moore; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 10.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.