Literature DB >> 17328776

Evaluation of transcranial magnetic stimulation for investigating transmission in descending motor tracts in the rat.

J B Nielsen1, M A Perez, M Oudega, M Enriquez-Denton, J-M Aimonetti.   

Abstract

In the rat, non-invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has shown promise for evaluation of transmission through the spinal cord before and after repair strategies, but it is still unclear which pathways are activated by TMS. The aim of the present study was therefore to identify these pathways and to analyse the effect of TMS on spinal neurons. In 19 rats, TMS evoked responses bilaterally in forelimb (biceps brachii; BB) and hindlimb muscles (tibialis anterior). The latency and amplitude of these motor-evoked responses (MEPs) were highly variable and depended strongly on the coil position and the stimulation intensity. The most frequently observed latencies for the BB MEPs could be divided into three groups: 3-6 ms, 8-12 ms and 14-18 ms. Lesions in the dorsal columns, which destroyed the corticospinal tract at C2 and C5, significantly depressed MEPs in the mid- and high-latency ranges, but not those in the low-latency range. Lesions in the dorsolateral funiculus, which interrupted the rubrospinal tract, had no effect on MEPs in any of the latency ranges. By contrast, bilateral lesion of the reticulospinal tract and other ventro-laterally located descending pathways abolished all responses. Intracellular recordings from 54 cervical motoneurons in five rats revealed that TMS evoked excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) at latencies that corresponded well with those of the BB MEPs. The short-latency EPSPs had rise times of around 1 ms, suggesting that they were mediated by a monosynaptic pathway. EPSPs with longer latencies had considerably longer rise times, which indicated conduction through polysynaptic pathways. Selective electrical stimulation of the pyramidal tract in the brainstem was performed in seven rats, where intracellular recordings from 70 motoneurons revealed that the earliest EPSPs and MEPs evoked by TMS were not mediated by the corticospinal tract, but by other descending motor pathways. Together, these results showed that in the rat TMS activates several descending pathways that converge on common spinal interneurons and motoneurons. Our observations confirm that the corticospinal tract has weak (and indirect) projections to cervical spinal motoneurons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17328776     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05326.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  22 in total

1.  Pronounced species divergence in corticospinal tract reorganization and functional recovery after lateralized spinal cord injury favors primates.

Authors:  Lucia Friedli; Ephron S Rosenzweig; Quentin Barraud; Martin Schubert; Nadia Dominici; Lea Awai; Jessica L Nielson; Pavel Musienko; Yvette Nout-Lomas; Hui Zhong; Sharon Zdunowski; Roland R Roy; Sarah C Strand; Rubia van den Brand; Leif A Havton; Michael S Beattie; Jacqueline C Bresnahan; Erwan Bézard; Jocelyne Bloch; V Reggie Edgerton; Adam R Ferguson; Armin Curt; Mark H Tuszynski; Grégoire Courtine
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 2.  Motor Cortex and Motor Cortical Interhemispheric Communication in Walking After Stroke: The Roles of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Animal Models in Our Current and Future Understanding.

Authors:  Charalambos C Charalambous; Mark G Bowden; DeAnna L Adkins
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Ultrasonic neuromodulation by brain stimulation with transcranial ultrasound.

Authors:  Yusuf Tufail; Anna Yoshihiro; Sandipan Pati; Monica M Li; William J Tyler
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Spinal cord direct current stimulation differentially modulates neuronal activity in the dorsal and ventral spinal cord.

Authors:  Weiguo Song; John H Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Preclinical and Clinical Evidence on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Projections: Implication for Motor Recovery.

Authors:  Ali Alawieh; Stephen Tomlinson; DeAnna Adkins; Steve Kautz; Wuwei Feng
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2017-07-09       Impact factor: 6.829

6.  Measures of cortical inhibition by paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation in anesthetized rats.

Authors:  Andrew M Vahabzadeh-Hagh; Paul A Muller; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Frances E Jensen; Alexander Rotenberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Horizontal ladder task-specific re-training in adult rats with contusive thoracic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Stephen M Onifer; Oliver Zhang; Laura K Whitnel-Smith; Kashif Raza; Christopher R O'Dell; Travis S Lyttle; Alexander G Rabchevsky; Patrick H Kitzman; Darlene A Burke
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.406

8.  Lateralization of forelimb motor evoked potentials by transcranial magnetic stimulation in rats.

Authors:  Alexander Rotenberg; Paul A Muller; Andrew M Vahabzadeh-Hagh; Xavier Navarro; Rubèn López-Vales; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Frances Jensen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Combined motor cortex and spinal cord neuromodulation promotes corticospinal system functional and structural plasticity and motor function after injury.

Authors:  Weiguo Song; Alzahraa Amer; Daniel Ryan; John H Martin
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 5.330

10.  Optogenetic Interrogation of Functional Synapse Formation by Corticospinal Tract Axons in the Injured Spinal Cord.

Authors:  Naveen Jayaprakash; Zimei Wang; Brian Hoeynck; Nicholas Krueger; Audra Kramer; Eric Balle; Daniel S Wheeler; Robert A Wheeler; Murray G Blackmore
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.