Literature DB >> 17327731

Emergency research: only possible if consent is waived?

Francois Lemaire1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Emergency research is possible only if informed consent is waived. Recent legislations have specifically addressed this issue, both in the US and in Europe. RECENT
FINDINGS: In the US, a specific regulation was enacted in 1996. Due to the added complexity, few trials have used this design. The necessity to inform the community in which a trial is supposed to take place, though feasible, is burdensome and time consuming. In the EU, directive 2001/20/CE forgot to specify particular rules for research in emergency conditions. After 2004, national legislations were supposed to implement the directive in order to enhance homogeneity within Europe, but actually showed an extreme diversity, with some countries allowing waiver of consent in emergency situations and others refusing it.
SUMMARY: Due to the active lobbying of emergency and intensive care specialists, the situation is slowly improving, with most national legislations recognizing the specificities and difficulty of emergency research.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17327731     DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32807f2ab7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care        ISSN: 1070-5295            Impact factor:   3.687


  8 in total

1.  The 'Consent to Research' paradigm in critical care: challenges and potential solutions.

Authors:  Karen E A Burns; Celia Zubrinich; John Marshall; Deborah Cook
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Waiver of consent for low-risk studies.

Authors:  François Lemaire
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.409

Review 3.  Dramatic innovations in modern surgical subspecialties.

Authors:  Chad G Ball; Francis Sutherland; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Elijah Dixon; Anthony R Maclean; Lloyd A Mack; David V Feliciano; Ravi R Rajani; Riyad Karmy-Jones; W Donald Buie; Walley J Temple; Grace S Rozycki; Alan Simeone
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 4.  Clinical trial design for endovascular ischemic stroke intervention.

Authors:  Osama O Zaidat; David S Liebeskind; Randall C Edgell; Catherine M Amlie-Lefond; Junaid S Kalia; Andrei V Alexandrov
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 5.  Use of deferred consent for severely ill children in a multi-centre phase III trial.

Authors:  Kathryn Maitland; Sassy Molyneux; Mwamvua Boga; Sarah Kiguli; Trudie Lang
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 6.  Exceptions to the rule of informed consent for research with an intervention.

Authors:  Susanne Rebers; Neil K Aaronson; Flora E van Leeuwen; Marjanka K Schmidt
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Factors Influencing Participation in Clinical Trials: Emergency Medicine vs. Other Specialties.

Authors:  Anita Kurt; Hope M Kincaid; Charity Curtis; Lauren Semler; Matthew Meyers; Melanie Johnson; Beth A Careyva; Brian Stello; Timothy J Friel; Mark C Knouse; John C Smulian; Jeanne L Jacoby
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-07-17

Review 8.  Taking the bull by the horns: Ethical considerations in the design and implementation of an Ebola virus therapy trial.

Authors:  Francis Kombe; Morenike O Folayan; Jennyfer Ambe; Adaora Igonoh; Akin Abayomi
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 4.634

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.