Literature DB >> 20858379

Dramatic innovations in modern surgical subspecialties.

Chad G Ball1, Francis Sutherland, Andrew W Kirkpatrick, Elijah Dixon, Anthony R Maclean, Lloyd A Mack, David V Feliciano, Ravi R Rajani, Riyad Karmy-Jones, W Donald Buie, Walley J Temple, Grace S Rozycki, Alan Simeone.   

Abstract

Innovation is defined as the introduction of something new, whether an idea, method or device. In this article, we describe the most important and innovative concepts and techniques that have advanced patient care within modern surgical subspecialties. We performed a systematic literature review and consulted academic subspecialty experts to evaluate recent changes in practice. The identified innovations included reduced blood loss and improved training in hepatobiliary surgery, total mesorectal excision and neoadjuvant therapies in colorectal surgery, prosthetic mesh in outpatient surgery, sentinel lymph node theory in surgical oncology, endovascular and wire-based skills in vascular and cardiovascular surgery, and the acceptance of abnormal anatomy through damage-control procedures in trauma and critical care. The common denominator among all subspecialties is an improvement in patient care manifested as a decrease in morbidity and mortality. Surgeons must continue to pursue innovative thinking, technological advances, improved training and systematic research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20858379      PMCID: PMC2947116     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  95 in total

Review 1.  Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  J Pablo Arnoletti; Kirby I Bland
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.495

Review 2.  Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast carcinoma: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  Theodore Kim; Armando E Giuliano; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair: long-term outcome with the focus on the influence of mesh reinforcement.

Authors:  B P Müller-Stich; F Holzinger; T Kapp; C Klaiber
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Guidelines for credentialing of practitioners to perform endovascular stent-grafting of the thoracic aorta.

Authors:  Nicholas T Kouchoukos; Joseph E Bavaria; Joseph S Coselli; Ralph De La Torre; John S Ikonomidis; Riyad C Karmy-Jones; Robert Scott Mitchell; Richard J Shemin; David Spielvogel; Lars G Svensson; Grayson H Wheatley
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Morbidity after sentinel lymph node biopsy in primary breast cancer: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anand David Purushotham; Sara Upponi; Manfred Borislav Klevesath; Lynda Bobrow; Keith Millar; Jonathan Peter Myles; Stephen William Duffy
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  A systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests for inguinal lymph node status in vulvar cancer.

Authors:  T J Selman; D M Luesley; N Acheson; K S Khan; C H Mann
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 7.  Sentinel node biopsy in squamous cell cancer of the oral cavity and oral pharynx: a diagnostic meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vinidh Paleri; Guy Rees; Puveendran Arullendran; Taimur Shoaib; Suren Krishman
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  Sentinel node biopsy for early-stage melanoma: accuracy and morbidity in MSLT-I, an international multicenter trial.

Authors:  Donald L Morton; Alistair J Cochran; John F Thompson; Robert Elashoff; Richard Essner; Edwin C Glass; Nicola Mozzillo; Omgo E Nieweg; Daniel F Roses; Harald J Hoekstra; Constantine P Karakousis; Douglas S Reintgen; Brendon J Coventry; He-jing Wang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy for evaluation and treatment of patients with Merkel cell carcinoma: The Dana-Farber experience and meta-analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Sheela G Gupta; Linda C Wang; Pablo F Peñas; Martina Gellenthin; Stephanie J Lee; Paul Nghiem
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2006-06

10.  A strategy for determining which thoracic esophageal cancer patients should undergo cervical lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Shiro Nagatani; Yutaka Shimada; Masato Kondo; Junichi Kaganoi; Masato Maeda; Go Watanabe; Masayuki Imamura
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Trends in the Canadian Surgery Forum (CSF): analysis of the CSF program over the past decade.

Authors:  Chad G Ball; Tammy L Eberle; Elijah Dixon; Cassandre Boland
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Fluorescent radiocolloids: are hybrid tracers the future for lymphatic mapping?

Authors:  Sergi Vidal-Sicart; Fijs W B van Leeuwen; Nynke S van den Berg; Renato A Valdés Olmos
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR): the need to identify the hospital units and referral centers entitled to perform it.

Authors:  Francesco Gossetti; Linda D'Amore; Francesca Ceci; Maria Romana Grimaldi; Paolo Negro
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-04-04

4.  Trends in the scientific program of the Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AHPBA) Annual Meeting over the past decade: the more things change, the more they stay the same.

Authors:  Chad G Ball; Elijah Dixon; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  The evolution of trauma surgery at a high-volume Canadian centre: implications for public health, prevention, clinical care, education and recruitment.

Authors:  Chad G Ball; Debanjana Das; Derek J Roberts; Christine Vis; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; John B Kortbeek
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.089

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.