Literature DB >> 17327202

A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society.

Andy Stirling1.   

Abstract

This paper addresses the scope for more integrated general analysis of diversity in science, technology and society. It proposes a framework recognizing three necessary but individually insufficient properties of diversity. Based on 10 quality criteria, it suggests a general quantitative non-parametric diversity heuristic. This allows the systematic exploration of diversity under different perspectives, including divergent conceptions of relevant attributes and contrasting weightings on different diversity properties. It is shown how this heuristic may be used to explore different possible trade-offs between diversity and other aspects of interest, including portfolio interactions. The resulting approach offers a way to be more systematic and transparent in the treatment of scientific and technological diversity in a range of fields, including conservation management, research governance, energy policy and sustainable innovation.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17327202      PMCID: PMC2373389          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2007.0213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  9 in total

1.  Science's new social contract with society.

Authors:  M Gibbons
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-12-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  The diversity-stability debate.

Authors:  K S McCann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-11       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Diversity in food technology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-07-31       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The importance of sequence diversity in the aggregation and evolution of proteins.

Authors:  Caroline F Wright; Sarah A Teichmann; Jane Clarke; Christopher M Dobson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Towards a unifying approach to diversity measures: bridging the gap between the Shannon entropy and Rao's quadratic index.

Authors:  Carlo Ricotta; Laszlo Szeidl
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  Structural diversity in binary nanoparticle superlattices.

Authors:  Elena V Shevchenko; Dmitri V Talapin; Nicholas A Kotov; Stephen O'Brien; Christopher B Murray
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Is the stock market efficient?

Authors:  B G Malkiel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Trees, bundles or nets?

Authors:  J M Smith
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 17.712

9.  The measure of diversity.

Authors:  R R Laxton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1978-01-07       Impact factor: 2.691

  9 in total
  44 in total

1.  How Does Socio-institutional Diversity Affect Collaborative Governance of Social-Ecological Systems in Practice?

Authors:  Julia Baird; Ryan Plummer; Lisen Schultz; Derek Armitage; Örjan Bodin
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  On the value of portfolio diversity in heart, lung, and blood research.

Authors:  Zorina S Galis; W Keith Hoots; James P Kiley; Michael S Lauer
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success.

Authors:  Lindell Bromham; Russell Dinnage; Xia Hua
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Nature's reach: narrow work has broad impact.

Authors:  Alexander J Gates; Qing Ke; Onur Varol; Albert-László Barabási
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology?

Authors:  Alan L Porter; Jan Youtie
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 2.253

6.  Assessing diversity in multiplex networks.

Authors:  Laura C Carpi; Tiago A Schieber; Panos M Pardalos; Gemma Marfany; Cristina Masoller; Albert Díaz-Guilera; Martín G Ravetti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The Socio-ecological Fit of Human Responses to Environmental Degradation: An Integrated Assessment Methodology.

Authors:  Helen Briassoulis
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  On the uncertainty of interdisciplinarity measurements due to incomplete bibliographic data.

Authors:  María Del Carmen Calatrava Moreno; Thomas Auzinger; Hannes Werthner
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.238

9.  Opening up the politics of knowledge and power in bioscience.

Authors:  Andy Stirling
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Nights at the museum: integrated arts and microbiology public engagement events enhance understanding of science whilst increasing community diversity and inclusion.

Authors:  Catherine J Duckett; Kate E Hargreaves; Kirstie M Rawson; K Elizabeth Allen; Sarah Forbes; Katherine E Rawlinson; Hollie Shaw; Melissa Lacey
Journal:  Access Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.