Literature DB >> 26239648

The Socio-ecological Fit of Human Responses to Environmental Degradation: An Integrated Assessment Methodology.

Helen Briassoulis1.   

Abstract

The scientific and policy interest in the human responses to environmental degradation usually focuses on responses sensu stricto and 'best practices' that potentially abate degradation in affected areas. The transfer of individual, discrete instruments and 'best practices' to different contexts is challenging, however, because socio-ecological systems are complex and environmental degradation is contextual and contingent. To sensibly assess the effectiveness of formal and informal interventions to combat environmental degradation, the paper proposes an integrative, non-reductionist analytic, the 'response assemblage', for the study of 'responses-in-context,' i.e., products of human decisions to utilize environmental resources to satisfy human needs in socio-ecological systems. Response assemblages are defined as geographically and historically unique, provisional, open, territorial wholes, complex compositions emerging from processes of assembling biophysical and human components, including responses sensu stricto, from affected focal and other socio-ecological systems, to serve human goals, one of which may be combatting environmental degradation. The degree of match among the components, called the socio-ecological fit of the response assemblage, indicates how effectively their contextual and contingent interactions maintain the socio-ecological resilience, promote sustainable development, and secure the continuous provision of ecosystem services in a focal socio-ecological system. The paper presents a conceptual approach to the analysis of the socio-ecological fit of response assemblages and details an integrated assessment methodology synthesizing the resilience, assemblage, and 'problem of fit' literature. Lastly, it summarizes the novelty, value, and policy relevance of conceptualizing human responses as response assemblages and of the integrated assessment methodology, reconsiders 'best practices' and suggests selected future research directions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assemblage; Environmental degradation; Integrated assessment; Responses; Socio-ecological fit; Socio-ecological resilience

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26239648     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-015-0584-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  4 in total

1.  Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations.

Authors:  Carl Folke; Steve Carpenter; Thomas Elmqvist; Lance Gunderson; C S Holling; Brian Walker
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society.

Authors:  Andy Stirling
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas.

Authors:  Elinor Ostrom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Anticipating critical transitions.

Authors:  Marten Scheffer; Stephen R Carpenter; Timothy M Lenton; Jordi Bascompte; William Brock; Vasilis Dakos; Johan van de Koppel; Ingrid A van de Leemput; Simon A Levin; Egbert H van Nes; Mercedes Pascual; John Vandermeer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 47.728

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.