PURPOSE: To determine normative R2* values in the liver and heart at 3T, and establish the relationship between R2* at 3T and 1.5T over a range of tissue iron concentrations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 healthy control subjects and 14 transfusion-dependent patients were scanned at 1.5T and 3T. At each field strength R2* imaging was performed in the liver and heart. RESULTS: Normative R2* values in the liver were estimated from the control group to be 39.2 +/- 9.0 second(-1) at 1.5T and 69.1 +/- 21.9 second(-1) at 3T. Normative cardiac values were estimated as 23.4 +/- 2.2 second(-1) at 1.5T and 30.0 +/- 3.7 second(-1) at 3T. The combined R2* data from patients and control subjects exhibited a linear relationship between 3T and 1.5T. In the liver, the line of best fit to the 3T vs. 1.5T data had a slope of 2.00 +/- 0.06 and an intercept of -11 +/- 4 second(-1). In the heart, it had a slope of 1.88 +/- 0.14 and an intercept of -15 +/- 4 second(-1). CONCLUSION: These preliminary data suggest that the iron-dependent component of R2* scales linearly with field strength over a wide range of tissue iron concentrations. The incidence of susceptibility artifacts may, however, also increase with field strength.
PURPOSE: To determine normative R2* values in the liver and heart at 3T, and establish the relationship between R2* at 3T and 1.5T over a range of tissue iron concentrations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 healthy control subjects and 14 transfusion-dependent patients were scanned at 1.5T and 3T. At each field strength R2* imaging was performed in the liver and heart. RESULTS: Normative R2* values in the liver were estimated from the control group to be 39.2 +/- 9.0 second(-1) at 1.5T and 69.1 +/- 21.9 second(-1) at 3T. Normative cardiac values were estimated as 23.4 +/- 2.2 second(-1) at 1.5T and 30.0 +/- 3.7 second(-1) at 3T. The combined R2* data from patients and control subjects exhibited a linear relationship between 3T and 1.5T. In the liver, the line of best fit to the 3T vs. 1.5T data had a slope of 2.00 +/- 0.06 and an intercept of -11 +/- 4 second(-1). In the heart, it had a slope of 1.88 +/- 0.14 and an intercept of -15 +/- 4 second(-1). CONCLUSION: These preliminary data suggest that the iron-dependent component of R2* scales linearly with field strength over a wide range of tissue iron concentrations. The incidence of susceptibility artifacts may, however, also increase with field strength.
Authors: L J Anderson; S Holden; B Davis; E Prescott; C C Charrier; N H Bunce; D N Firmin; B Wonke; J Porter; J M Walker; D J Pennell Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: B Henninger; C Kremser; S Rauch; R Eder; H Zoller; A Finkenstedt; H J Michaely; M Schocke Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-05-30 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Gabriel C Camargo; Tamara Rothstein; Flavia P Junqueira; Elsa Fernandes; Andreas Greiser; Ralph Strecker; Viviani Pessoa; Ronaldo S L Lima; Ilan Gottlieb Journal: Int J Hematol Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 2.490
Authors: Kotaro Yoshida; Naoki Takahashi; Bernard F King; Akira Kawashima; Peter C Harris; Lynn D Cornell; Emilie Cornec-Le Gall; Dai Inoue; Ichiro Mizushima; Mitsuhiro Kawano; Eric Thervet; Paul René de Cotret; Vicente E Torres Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-02-26 Impact factor: 5.315