Literature DB >> 17325408

Repeated mobility testing for later artificial visual function evaluation.

M Velikay-Parel1, D Ivastinovic, M Koch, R Hornig, G Dagnelie, G Richard, A Langmann.   

Abstract

The study investigates the utility of a newly designed mobility test for repeated testing of visual function in patients with severe visual impairment and future application in evaluating functional progress in patients with artificial vision. Ten subjects divided into three groups based on visual acuity (VA) ranging from light perception to 20/200 and reduced visual field (VF) were included in the study. The mobility test consisted of using a set of four different but structurally similar and relatively short mazes having a constant number of obstacles of various sizes. The subjects, divided into three groups by acuity, passed through each course several times. In general, the patients with better VA had a larger extent of VF. Average speed and number of contacts were recorded as measures of performance. The average passing times of the groups through the courses were significantly different (p = 0.03), which was influenced by VA and VF. There was no significant difference in average number of contacts between the groups (p = 0.15). The mobility test proved to be appropriate for gaining statistically relevant results in repeated individual testing of patients with severe vision impairment. Results show promise for use this mobility test as a tool for assessing visual function of patients undergoing implantation of a visual prosthesis for artificial vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17325408     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/4/1/S12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  8 in total

1.  A standardized obstacle course for assessment of visual function in ultra low vision and artificial vision.

Authors:  Amy Catherine Nau; Christine Pintar; Christopher Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; KwonHo Jeong
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 2.  Retinal implants: emergence of a multidisciplinary field.

Authors:  Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.710

3.  Orientation and mobility assessment in retinal prosthetic clinical trials.

Authors:  Duane R Geruschat; Ava K Bittner; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 4.  [Visual prostheses].

Authors:  P Walter
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Outcome measure for the treatment of cone photoreceptor diseases: orientation to a scene with cone-only contrast.

Authors:  Alejandro J Roman; Artur V Cideciyan; Rodrigo Matsui; Rebecca Sheplock; Sharon B Schwartz; Samuel G Jacobson
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Quantifying the impact on navigation performance in visually impaired: Auditory information loss versus information gain enabled through electronic travel aids.

Authors:  Alex Kreilinger; Thomas Georgi; Gudrun Pregartner; Domagoj Ivastinovic; Tamara Pichler; Andrea Berghold; Michaela Velikay-Parel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Validation of a Vision-Guided Mobility Assessment for RPE65-Associated Retinal Dystrophy.

Authors:  Neruban Kumaran; Robin R Ali; Nick A Tyler; James W B Bainbridge; Michel Michaelides; Gary S Rubin
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Assessing Photoreceptor Status in Retinal Dystrophies: From High-Resolution Imaging to Functional Vision.

Authors:  José-Alain Sahel; Kate Grieve; Chloé Pagot; Colas Authié; Saddek Mohand-Said; Michel Paques; Isabelle Audo; Karine Becker; Anne-Elisabeth Chaumet-Riffaud; Line Azoulay; Emmanuel Gutman; Thierry Léveillard; Christina Zeitz; Serge Picaud; Deniz Dalkara; Katia Marazova
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 5.258

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.