Literature DB >> 22902422

Orientation and mobility assessment in retinal prosthetic clinical trials.

Duane R Geruschat1, Ava K Bittner, Gislin Dagnelie.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop an orientation and mobility (O&M) assessment protocol to implement in subjects who have been implanted with an artificial silicon retina (ASR), and to use this experience to propose a research agenda for O&M with prosthetic vision.
METHODS: A controlled and naturalistic assessment was developed that included walking a prescribed obstacle course and travel to and from a hospital cafeteria. Subjects were tested before and 3 and 6 months after being implanted with the ASR. Outcome measures were walking speed and number of contacts with obstacles. The experiences from this study led to a proposed research agenda in O&M.
RESULTS: Eight subjects with retinitis pigmentosa participated in this study. The vision status of the subjects ranged from <20/1600 to 20/80 visual acuity and visual fields of <5 to 40°. Using a repeated-measures analysis of variance, no differences were found in the primary outcome measures. Four subjects were observed to have reduced mobility after implantation. Three subjects self-reported enhancements of travel after implantation, but this enhancement was not observed.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that mobility might not be improved with prosthetic vision. The proposed research agenda emphasizes the importance of developing individualized assessments, identifying specific items of orientation rather than mobility for measuring the effect of prosthetic vision, and to develop and evaluate instructional programs that may be needed to obtain the full benefit of the technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22902422      PMCID: PMC3888774          DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182686251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  12 in total

1.  Does mobility performance of visually impaired adults improve immediately after orientation and mobility training?

Authors:  G P Soong; J E Lovie-Kitchin; B Brown
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 2.  Orientation and mobility training for adults with low vision.

Authors:  G Virgili; G Rubin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

3.  Mobility function in older veterans improves after blind rehabilitation.

Authors:  Thomas Kuyk; Jeffry L Elliott; Johnna Wesley; Kay Scilley; Elizabeth McIntosh; Susan Mitchell; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2004-05

4.  Visual field size criteria for mobility rehabilitation referral.

Authors:  Jan E Lovie-Kitchin; Grace P Soong; Shirin E Hassan; Russell L Woods
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Estimating the amount of mental effort required for independent mobility: persons with glaucoma.

Authors:  Duane R Geruschat; Kathleen A Turano
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Traditional measures of mobility performance and retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  D R Geruschat; K A Turano; J W Stahl
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Grating acuity and contrast tests for clinical trials of severe vision loss.

Authors:  Ava K Bittner; Pamela Jeter; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Comparison of functional mobility performance with clinical vision measures in simulated retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  S Haymes; D Guest; A Heyes; A Johnston
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Repeated mobility testing for later artificial visual function evaluation.

Authors:  M Velikay-Parel; D Ivastinovic; M Koch; R Hornig; G Dagnelie; G Richard; A Langmann
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Visual factors and orientation-mobility performance.

Authors:  J A Marron; I L Bailey
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1982-05
View more
  9 in total

1.  Chapter 1 - Restoring Vision to the Blind: The New Age of Implanted Visual Prostheses.

Authors: 
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.283

2.  A standardized obstacle course for assessment of visual function in ultra low vision and artificial vision.

Authors:  Amy Catherine Nau; Christine Pintar; Christopher Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; KwonHo Jeong
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Novel mobility test to assess functional vision in patients with inherited retinal dystrophies.

Authors:  Daniel C Chung; Sarah McCague; Zi-Fan Yu; Satha Thill; Julie DiStefano-Pappas; Jean Bennett; Dominique Cross; Kathleen Marshall; Jennifer Wellman; Katherine A High
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  FLORA™: Phase I development of a functional vision assessment for prosthetic vision users.

Authors:  Duane R Geruschat; Marshall Flax; Nilima Tanna; Michelle Bianchi; Andy Fisher; Mira Goldschmidt; Lynne Fisher; Gislin Dagnelie; Jim Deremeik; Audrey Smith; Fatima Anaflous; Jessy Dorn
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  Harmonization of Outcomes and Vision Endpoints in Vision Restoration Trials: Recommendations from the International HOVER Taskforce.

Authors:  Lauren N Ayton; Joseph F Rizzo; Ian L Bailey; August Colenbrander; Gislin Dagnelie; Duane R Geruschat; Philip C Hessburg; Chris D McCarthy; Matthew A Petoe; Gary S Rubin; Philip R Troyk
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  Optimising technology to measure functional vision, mobility and service outcomes for people with low vision or blindness: protocol for a prospective cohort study in Australia and Malaysia.

Authors:  Lil Deverell; Denny Meyer; Bee Theng Lau; Abdullah Al Mahmud; Suku Sukunesan; Jahar Bhowmik; Almon Chai; Chris McCarthy; Pan Zheng; Andrew Pipingas; Fakir M Amirul Islam
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Development of the Ultra-Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire (ULV-VFQ).

Authors:  Pamela E Jeter; Collin Rozanski; Robert Massof; Olukemi Adeyemo; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Validation of a Vision-Guided Mobility Assessment for RPE65-Associated Retinal Dystrophy.

Authors:  Neruban Kumaran; Robin R Ali; Nick A Tyler; James W B Bainbridge; Michel Michaelides; Gary S Rubin
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Data Acquisition, Processing, and Reduction for Home-Use Trial of a Wearable Video Camera-Based Mobility Aid.

Authors:  Shrinivas Pundlik; Vilte Baliutaviciute; Mojtaba Moharrer; Alex R Bowers; Gang Luo
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.283

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.