BACKGROUND: It is unclear to what extent interarm blood pressure (BP) differences are reproducible vs the result of random error. The present study was designed to resolve this issue. METHODS: We enrolled 147 consecutive patients from a hypertension clinic. Three sets of 3 BP readings were recorded, first using 2 oscillometric devices simultaneously in the 2 arms (set 1); next, 3 readings were taken sequentially for each arm using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer (set 2); finally, the readings as performed for set 1 were repeated (set 3). The protocol was repeated at a second visit for 91 patients. RESULTS: Large interarm systolic BP differences were consistently seen in 2 patients with obstructive arterial disease. In the remaining patients, the systolic BP and the diastolic BP, respectively, were slightly higher in the right arm than in the left arm by 2 to 3 mm Hg and by 1 mm Hg for all 3 sets (P<.01 for all). For the systolic BP and the diastolic BP, respectively, the numbers of patients who had a mean interarm difference of more than 5 mm Hg were 11 (7.5%) and 4 (2.7%) across all 3 sets of readings. Among patients who repeated the test, none had a consistent interarm BP difference of more than 5 mm Hg across the 2 visits. CONCLUSIONS: The interarm BP difference was consistent only when obstructive arterial disease was present. Although BP in the right arm tended to be higher than in the left arm, clinically meaningful interarm differences were not reproducible in the absence of obstructive arterial disease and are attributable to random variation.
BACKGROUND: It is unclear to what extent interarm blood pressure (BP) differences are reproducible vs the result of random error. The present study was designed to resolve this issue. METHODS: We enrolled 147 consecutive patients from a hypertension clinic. Three sets of 3 BP readings were recorded, first using 2 oscillometric devices simultaneously in the 2 arms (set 1); next, 3 readings were taken sequentially for each arm using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer (set 2); finally, the readings as performed for set 1 were repeated (set 3). The protocol was repeated at a second visit for 91 patients. RESULTS: Large interarm systolic BP differences were consistently seen in 2 patients with obstructive arterial disease. In the remaining patients, the systolic BP and the diastolic BP, respectively, were slightly higher in the right arm than in the left arm by 2 to 3 mm Hg and by 1 mm Hg for all 3 sets (P<.01 for all). For the systolic BP and the diastolic BP, respectively, the numbers of patients who had a mean interarm difference of more than 5 mm Hg were 11 (7.5%) and 4 (2.7%) across all 3 sets of readings. Among patients who repeated the test, none had a consistent interarm BP difference of more than 5 mm Hg across the 2 visits. CONCLUSIONS: The interarm BP difference was consistent only when obstructive arterial disease was present. Although BP in the right arm tended to be higher than in the left arm, clinically meaningful interarm differences were not reproducible in the absence of obstructive arterial disease and are attributable to random variation.
Authors: Matthew S Ganio; R Matthew Brothers; Rebekah A I Lucas; Jeffrey L Hastings; Craig G Crandall Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Jang Young Kim; Eung Ju Kim; June Namgung; Byung-Ryul Cho; Chang-Wook Nam; Young-Kwon Kim; Jeong Bae Park Journal: Hypertens Res Date: 2016-12-22 Impact factor: 3.872
Authors: Tatiana Nwankwo; Sallyann M Coleman King; Yechiam Ostchega; Guangyu Zhang; Fleetwood Loustalot; Cathleen Gillespie; Tiffany E Chang; Elin B Begley; Mary G George; Daichi Shimbo; Joseph E Schwartz; Paul Muntner; Ian M Kronish; Yuling Hong; Robert Merritt Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Ido Weinberg; Philimon Gona; Christopher J O'Donnell; Michael R Jaff; Joanne M Murabito Journal: Am J Med Date: 2013-11-25 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Marco Canepa; Yuri Milaneschi; Pietro Ameri; Majd AlGhatrif; Giovanna Leoncini; Paolo Spallarossa; Roberto Pontremoli; Claudio Brunelli; James B Strait; Edward G Lakatta; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2013-08-07 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Matthew A Allison; Mary Cushman; Cam Solomon; Victor Aboyans; Mary M McDermott; David C Goff; Michael H Criqui Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2009-07-22 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Thomas G Pickering; Nancy Houston Miller; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Lawrence R Krakoff; Nancy T Artinian; David Goff Journal: Hypertension Date: 2008-05-22 Impact factor: 10.190