Literature DB >> 32020541

Inter- and intra-provincial variation in screen-detected breast cancer across five Canadian provinces: a CanIMPACT study.

Marcy Winget1, Yan Yuan2, Mary L McBride3, Cynthia Kendell4, Kathleen M Decker5,6, Eva Grunfeld7, Patti A Groome8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer screening aims to identify cancers in early stages when prognosis is better and treatments less invasive. We describe inter- and intra-provincial variation in the percentage of screen-detected cases under publicly funded healthcare systems and factors related to having screen- vs non-screen-detected breast cancer across five Canadian provinces.
METHODS: Women aged 40+ diagnosed with incident breast cancer from 2007 to 2012 in five Canadian provinces were identified from their respective provincial cancer registries. Standardized provincial datasets were created linking screening, health administrative, and claims data. Province-specific logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association of demographic and healthcare utilization factors in each province with the odds of screen-detected cancer.
RESULTS: There was significant inter- and intra-provincial variation by age. Screen detection ranged from 42% to 52% in ages 50-69 but women aged 50-59 had approximately 4-8% lower screen detection than those aged 60-69 in all provinces. Screening associations with income quintile and rurality varied across provinces. Those least likely to be screen-detected within a province were consistently in the lowest income quintile; OR ranged from 0.62-0.89 relative to highest income quintile/urban patients aged 50-69. Lack of visits to primary care 30 months prior to diagnosis was also consistently associated with lower odds of screen detection (OR range, 0.37-0.76).
CONCLUSION: Breast cancer screen detection rates in the Canadian provinces examined are relatively high. Associations with income-rurality indicate a need for greater attention and/or targeted outreach to specific communities and/or provincial regions to improve access to breast cancer screening services intra-provincially.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Administrative data linkage; Breast cancer screening; Multi-jurisdictional; Screen-detected cancer

Year:  2020        PMID: 32020541      PMCID: PMC7501385          DOI: 10.17269/s41997-019-00282-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Public Health        ISSN: 0008-4263


  19 in total

1.  Using the Johns Hopkins Aggregated Diagnosis Groups (ADGs) to predict mortality in a population-based cohort of adults with schizophrenia in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Alice Newman; Paul A Kurdyak
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 2.  Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Rochelle Fu; Amy Cantor; Miranda Pappas; Monica Daeges; Linda Humphrey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Disaggregating the mortality reductions due to cancer screening: model-based estimates from population-based data.

Authors:  James Anthony Hanley; Sisse Helle Njor
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Breast Cancer Screening in 2018: Time for Shared Decision Making.

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Lydia E Pace
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Using administrative data to estimate time to breast cancer diagnosis and percent of screen-detected breast cancers – a validation study in Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Y Yuan; M Li; J Yang; M Winget
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.520

Review 6.  Indices for continuity of care: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Sandra H Jee; Michael D Cabana
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.929

7.  The Canadian National Breast Screening Study-1: breast cancer mortality after 11 to 16 years of follow-up. A randomized screening trial of mammography in women age 40 to 49 years.

Authors:  Anthony B Miller; Teresa To; Cornelia J Baines; Claus Wall
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Breast cancer screening programmes in 22 countries: current policies, administration and guidelines. International Breast Cancer Screening Network (IBSN) and the European Network of Pilot Projects for Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  S Shapiro; E A Coleman; M Broeders; M Codd; H de Koning; J Fracheboud; S Moss; E Paci; S Stachenko; R Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Continuity of primary care and emergency department utilization among elderly people.

Authors:  Raluca Ionescu-Ittu; Jane McCusker; Antonio Ciampi; Alain-Michel Vadeboncoeur; Danièle Roberge; Danielle Larouche; Josée Verdon; Raynald Pineault
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Lessons Learned: It Takes a Village to Understand Inter-Sectoral Care Using Administrative Data across Jurisdictions.

Authors:  Patti Ann Groome; Mary L McBride; Li Jiang; Cynthia Kendell; Kathleen M Decker; Eva Grunfeld; Monika K Krzyzanowska; Marcy Winget
Journal:  Int J Popul Data Sci       Date:  2018-11-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.