Literature DB >> 17324027

Gender bias in diagnostic criteria for personality disorders: an item response theory analysis.

J Serrita Jane1, Thomas F Oltmanns, Susan C South, Eric Turkheimer.   

Abstract

The authors examined gender bias in the diagnostic criteria for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., text revision; American Psychiatric Association, 2000) personality disorders. Participants (N=599) were selected from 2 large, nonclinical samples on the basis of information from self-report questionnaires and peer nominations that suggested the presence of personality pathology. All were interviewed with the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality (B. Pfohl, N. Blum, & M. Zimmerman, 1997). Using item response theory methods, the authors compared data from 315 men and 284 women, searching for evidence of differential item functioning in the diagnostic features of 10 personality disorder categories. Results indicated significant but moderate measurement bias pertaining to gender for 6 specific criteria. In other words, men and women with equivalent levels of pathology endorsed the items at different rates. For 1 paranoid personality disorder criterion and 3 antisocial criteria, men were more likely to endorse the biased items. For 2 schizoid personality disorder criteria, women were more likely to endorse the biased items. (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17324027      PMCID: PMC4372614          DOI: 10.1037/0021-843X.116.1.166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol        ISSN: 0021-843X


  22 in total

1.  Differential impairment as an indicator of sex bias in DSM-IV criteria for four personality disorders.

Authors:  Christina D Boggs; Leslie C Morey; Andrew E Skodol; M Tracie Shea; Charles A Sanislow; Carlos M Grilo; Thomas H McGlashan; Mary C Zanarini; John G Gunderson
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2005-12

2.  Gender differences on negative affectivity: an IRT study of differential item functioning on the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire Stress Reaction Scale.

Authors:  L L Smith; S P Reise
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-11

Review 3.  How shall we speak of children's personalities in middle childhood? A preliminary taxonomy.

Authors:  R L Shiner
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Invited essay: sex biases in the diagnosis of personality disorders.

Authors:  T A Widiger
Journal:  J Pers Disord       Date:  1998

5.  Evaluation of attitude survey translations an investigation using item response theory.

Authors:  B B Ellis; B Minsel; P Becker
Journal:  Int J Psychol       Date:  1989

6.  Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Feingold
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: two approaches for exploring measurement invariance.

Authors:  Steven P Reise; Keith F Widaman; Robin H Pugh
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  The interrater reliability of the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality.

Authors:  J Serrita Jane; Jason L Pagan; Eric Turkheimer; Edna R Fiedler; Thomas F Oltmanns
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 3.735

9.  Pathology versus statistical infrequency: potential sources of gender bias in personality disorder criteria.

Authors:  K G Anderson; L M Sankis; T A Widiger
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.254

10.  Gender stereotypes for paranoid, antisocial, compulsive, dependent, and histrionic personality disorders.

Authors:  B M Rienzi; D J Scrams
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1991-12
View more
  13 in total

1.  An item response theory integration of normal and abnormal personality scales.

Authors:  Douglas B Samuel; Leonard J Simms; Lee Anna Clark; W John Livesley; Thomas A Widiger
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2010-01

2.  The impact of gender on the assessment of body checking behavior.

Authors:  Lauren Alfano; Tom Hildebrandt; Katie Bannon; Catherine Walker; Kate E Walton
Journal:  Body Image       Date:  2010-11-18

3.  Measurement invariance of the DSM-5 Section III pathological personality trait model across sex.

Authors:  Takakuni Suzuki; Susan C South; Douglas B Samuel; Aidan G C Wright; Matthew M Yalch; Christopher J Hopwood; Katherine M Thomas
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2018-06-28

Review 4.  Interpersonal dysfunction in personality disorders: A meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Sylia Wilson; Catherine B Stroud; C Emily Durbin
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Genetic and Environmental Structure of DSM-IV Criteria for Antisocial Personality Disorder: A Twin Study.

Authors:  Tom Rosenström; Eivind Ystrom; Fartein Ask Torvik; Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski; Nathan A Gillespie; Steven H Aggen; Robert F Krueger; Kenneth S Kendler; Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  Health measurement in population surveys: combining information from self-reported and observer-measured health indicators.

Authors:  George B Ploubidis; Emily Grundy
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2011-05

7.  A psychometric investigation of gender differences and common processes across borderline and antisocial personality disorders.

Authors:  Seokjoon Chun; Alexa Harris; Margely Carrion; Elizabeth Rojas; Stephen Stark; Carl Lejuez; William V Lechner; Marina A Bornovalova
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2016-11-03

8.  Dynamic of Change in Pathological Personality Trait Dimensions: A Latent Change Analysis Among at-Risk Women.

Authors:  Baptiste Barbot; Scott R Hunter; Elena L Grigorenko; Suniya S Luthar
Journal:  J Psychopathol Behav Assess       Date:  2013-06-01

9.  A psychometric evaluation of the DSM-IV borderline personality disorder criteria: age and sex moderation of criterion functioning.

Authors:  S H Aggen; M C Neale; E Røysamb; T Reichborn-Kjennerud; K S Kendler
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 7.723

10.  ARE WE MISSING LUPUS IN MALES? EVIDENCE OF COGNITIVE BIAS FROM A RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENT IN THE UNITED STATES.

Authors:  Julia F Simard; Yashaar Chaichian; Nada Rizk; Amadeia Rector; Candace H Feldman; Titilola O Falasinnu
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 5.363

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.