Literature DB >> 9866192

Gender differences on negative affectivity: an IRT study of differential item functioning on the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire Stress Reaction Scale.

L L Smith1, S P Reise.   

Abstract

Item response theory methods were used to study differential item functioning (DIF) between gender groups on a measure of stress reaction. Results revealed that women were more likely to endorse items describing emotional vulnerability and sensitivity, whereas men were more likely to endorse items describing tension, irritability, and being easily upset. Item factor analysis yielded 5 correlated factors, and the DIF analysis, in turn, revealed differential gender mean differences on these factors. This finding illustrates how even in an essentially unidimensional scale, comparison of group mean differences can be affected by multidimensionality caused by item clusters that share similar content. Results do not support arguments that measures of negative affective dispositions "artificially" produce gender mean differences by focusing on specific selected content areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9866192     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.5.1350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  17 in total

1.  Evaluating the equivalence of health care ratings by whites and Hispanics.

Authors:  L S Morales; S P Reise; R D Hays
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  An item response theory integration of normal and abnormal personality scales.

Authors:  Douglas B Samuel; Leonard J Simms; Lee Anna Clark; W John Livesley; Thomas A Widiger
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2010-01

3.  Bifactor models and rotations: exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores.

Authors:  Steven P Reise; Tyler M Moore; Mark G Haviland
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2010-11

4.  Assessing the Personal Negative Impacts of Hooking Up Experienced by College Students: Gender Differences and Mental Health.

Authors:  Lucy E Napper; Kevin S Montes; Shannon R Kenney; Joseph W LaBrie
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2015-10-07

5.  The impact of gender on the assessment of body checking behavior.

Authors:  Lauren Alfano; Tom Hildebrandt; Katie Bannon; Catherine Walker; Kate E Walton
Journal:  Body Image       Date:  2010-11-18

6.  Item response theory analyses of the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT).

Authors:  Sun-Joo Cho; Jeremy Wilmer; Grit Herzmann; Rankin Williams McGugin; Daniel Fiset; Ana E Van Gulick; Kaitlin F Ryan; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2015-02-02

7.  Progression to problem drinking among Mexican American and White European first-year college students: a multiple group analysis.

Authors:  C Amanda Schweizer; Neal Doran; Scott C Roesch; Mark G Myers
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.582

8.  Improving the assessment of measurement invariance: Using regularization to select anchor items and identify differential item functioning.

Authors:  William C M Belzak; Daniel J Bauer
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2020-01-09

9.  Examining item bias in the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Wai-Kwong Tang; Eric Wong; Helen F K Chiu; C M Lum; Gabor S Ungvari
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.035

10.  Consistency matters: measurement invariance of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire in patients with hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Kathrin Sommer; Francesco Cottone; Neil K Aaronson; Peter Fayers; Paola Fazi; Gianantonio Rosti; Emanuele Angelucci; Gianluca Gaidano; Adriano Venditti; Maria Teresa Voso; Michele Baccarani; Marco Vignetti; Fabio Efficace
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.